Judge: Robert B. Broadbelt, Case: 19STCV34981, Date: 2023-10-18 Tentative Ruling
Tentative rulings are sometimes, but not always, posted. The purpose of posting a tentative ruling is to to help focus the argument. The posting of a tentative ruling is not an invitation for the filing of additional papers shortly before the hearing.
Case Number: 19STCV34981 Hearing Date: October 18, 2023 Dept: 53
Superior Court of California
County of Los Angeles – Central District
Department
53
|
vs. |
Case
No.: |
19STCV34981 |
|
|
|
|
|
Hearing
Date: |
October
18, 2023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[Tentative]
Order RE: defendants’ motion to continue trial and
related dates |
||
MOVING PARTIES:
Defendants Wange Lu and Wei
Dang
RESPONDING
PARTY: Plaintiff The San Gabriel
Valley Council of Governments, in Furtherance of the Alameda Corridor-East
Construction Project
Motion to Continue Trial and Related Dates
The court considered the moving, opposition, and reply papers filed in
connection with this motion.
DISCUSSION
Defendant Wange Lu and Wei Dang (“Defendants”) move the court for an
order continuing trial and related deadlines in this action to a date after
plaintiff The San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments, in Furtherance of the
Alameda Corridor-East Construction Project (“Plaintiff”) begins construction on
the project that is the subject of this action.
The court finds that Defendants have not met their burden to show good
cause to continue trial in this action. (Cal.
Rules of Ct., rule 3.1332, subd. (c) [“The court may grant a continuance [of
trial] only on an affirmative showing of good cause requiring the
continuance”].) Although Defendants
request that the court continue trial “to a date after Project construction
activity . . . has commenced and progressed[,]” the court has not been
presented with evidence establishing the exact date on which (1) construction
will begin, and (2) Defendants will obtain the evidence that they desire. (Mot., p. 7:1-5; Herrington Decl., ¶ 7
[the project’s “anticipated start date” is “early 2024”] [emphasis
added].) Further, the court notes that
this case will be five years old on October 1, 2024. (Code Civ. Proc., § 583.310.)
The court therefore denies Defendants’ motion. (Cal. Rules of Ct., rule 3.1332, subd. (c).)
ORDER
The court denies defendants
Wange Lu and Wei Dang’s motion to continue trial and related dates.
The court orders plaintiff The
San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments, in Furtherance of the Alameda
Corridor-East Construction Project to give notice of this ruling.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED:
_____________________________
Robert
B. Broadbelt III
Judge
of the Superior Court