Judge: Robert B. Broadbelt, Case: 20STCV29679, Date: 2022-08-22 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 20STCV29679 Hearing Date: August 22, 2022 Dept: 53
Superior Court of California
County of Los Angeles – Central District
Department
53
|
vs. JANET
TROTTER |
Case
No.: |
20STCV29679 |
|
|
|
|
|
Hearing
Date: |
August
22, 2022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[Tentative]
Order RE: (1)
petition
to approve compromise of pending action on behalf of minor (naelynn hernandez); (2)
petition
to approve compromise of pending action on behalf of minor (nahlia hernandez); (3)
petition
to approve compromise of pending action on behalf of minor (nicholas
hernandez) |
||
MOVING PARTY: Plaintiff and Petitioner Blanca
Reyes
RESPONDING PARTY: n/a
(1)
Petition
to Approve Compromise of Pending Action on Behalf of Minor (Naelynn Hernandez)
(2)
Petition
to Approve Compromise of Pending Action on Behalf of Minor (Nahlia Hernandez)
(3)
Petition
to Approve Compromise of Pending Action on Behalf of Minor (Nicholas Hernandez)
The court considered the moving papers. No oppositions to the petitions were filed.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs filed this
habitability action against defendant Janet Trotter, as Trustee of the Janet
Trotter Revocable Trust dated July 11, 2013 on August 6, 2020, asserting three
causes of action for (1) breach of the warranty of habitability, (2) negligence,
and (3) breach of quiet enjoyment.
Plaintiff and petitioner
Blanca Reyes seeks court approval of the settlement on behalf of claimants
Naelynn Hernandez, Nahlia Hernandez, and Nicholas Hernandez, who are minors.
Defendant Janet Trotter,
as Trustee of the Janet Trotter Revocable Trust dated July 11, 2013 has agreed
to pay a total of $106,000 to Plaintiffs to settle this action, of which $2,166
is allocated to each minor claimant.[1]
Of the $2,166 that is
allocated to claimant Naelynn Hernandez, $541.50 will be paid to counsel for
claimant’s attorney’s fees, $339.30 will be paid to counsel for one-sixth of
legal costs incurred, and the remaining $1,285.20 will be deposited in an insured
account, subject to withdrawal only on authorization of the court. (Pet., MC-350, ¶¶ 16, 18, subd.
(b)(2).)
Of the $2,166 that is
allocated to claimant Nahlia Hernandez, $541.50 will be paid to counsel for
claimant’s attorney’s fees, $339.30 will be paid to counsel for one-sixth of
legal costs incurred, and the remaining $1,285.20 will be deposited in an
insured account, subject to withdrawal only on authorization of the court. (Pet., MC-350, ¶¶ 16, 18, subd.
(b)(2).)
Of the $2,166 that is
allocated to claimant Nicholas Hernandez, $541.50 will be paid to counsel for
claimant’s attorney’s fees, $339.30 will be paid to counsel for one-sixth of
legal costs incurred, and the remaining $1,285.20 will be deposited in an
insured account, subject to withdrawal only on authorization of the court. (Pet., MC-350, ¶¶ 16, 18, subd.
(b)(2).)
Legal
Standard
The compromise of a minor’s disputed claim for damages is valid only
after it has been approved, upon the filing of a petition, by the court. (Prob. Code, § 3500.) The petition must be verified by the
petitioner, must contain a full disclosure of all information that has any
bearing upon the reasonableness of the compromise, and must be prepared on
judicial council form MC-350. (Cal.
Rules of Court, rule 7.950.)
Discussion
The
court has reviewed the petitions and finds the settlement to be fair and
reasonable, and in the best interests of minor claimants Naelynn Hernandez,
Nahlia Hernandez, and Nicholas Hernandez.
The
court finds that the declarations of Claudia Medina, counsel for minor
claimants, is sufficient to support the 25 percent request for attorney’s
fees.
The
court grants plaintiff and petitioner Blanca Reyes’s petitions to approve the
settlement of minor claimants Naelynn Hernandez, Nahlia Hernandez, and Nicholas
Hernandez.
The
court sets an Order to Show Cause re: filing Receipt and Acknowledgment of
Order for the Deposit of Money Into Blocked Account on __________________, 2022, at 11:00 a.m., in
Department 53.
The court orders plaintiff and petitioner Blanca Reyes to
give notice of this order.
IT
IS SO ORDERED.
DATED:
_____________________________
Robert
B. Broadbelt III
Judge
of the Superior Court
[1] The
court notes that each of the petitions mistakenly state that the settling
defendant is Naelynn Hernandez.
(Petitions, MC-350 ¶ 10, subd. (b).) Naelynn Hernandez is not the settling
defendant, but rather, one of the minor claimants. However, the court evaluates the merits of
the petitions notwithstanding this error, since Plaintiffs’ counsel has
submitted a declaration establishing that (1) the defendant in this action is
Janet Trotter, as Trustee of the Janet Trotter Revocable Family Trust dated July
11, 2013, (2) Plaintiffs have settled with defendants, and (3) the defendants
will pay to Plaintiffs the settlement sum as described in the petitions. (Petitions, MC-350, Attachments 11(b)(6),
Medina Decl., ¶¶ 2-5.)