Judge: Robert B. Broadbelt, Case: 21STCV02859, Date: 2023-01-23 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 21STCV02859 Hearing Date: January 23, 2023 Dept: 53
Superior Court of California
County of Los Angeles – Central District
Department
53
|
vs. |
Case
No.: |
21STCV02859 |
|
|
|
|
|
Hearing
Date: |
January
23, 2023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[Tentative]
Order RE: plaintiff’s motion to compel initial
responses to special interrogatories, set one |
||
MOVING PARTY: Plaintiff Consumer Advocacy Group, Inc.
RESPONDING PARTY: Unopposed
Motion to Compel Initial Responses to
Special Interrogatories, Set One
The court considered the moving papers filed in connection with this
motion. No opposition papers were
filed.
DISCUSSION
Plaintiff Consumer Advocacy Group, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) moves the court
for an order (1) compelling defendant Midland Hardware Company No. 4
(“Defendant”) to provide initial responses to Plaintiff’s Special
Interrogatories, Set One, and (2) awarding sanctions in favor of Plaintiff and
against Defendant in the amount of $1,747.50.
If the party to whom interrogatories are directed fails to serve a
timely response, the propounding party may move for an order compelling
response to the interrogatories. (Code Civ. Proc., §¿2030.290, subd.
(b).)
Plaintiff served Defendant with its Special Interrogatories, Set One,
on February 4, 2022. (Rasiah Decl.,
¶ 2; Rasiah Decl., Ex. A.)
Plaintiff asserts that, at the time of filing the pending motion,
Defendant failed to provide responses.
(Rasiah Decl., ¶ 5.)
Defendant has not filed an opposition to Plaintiff’s motion or presented
evidence to the court establishing that responses have been served. The court therefore grants Plaintiff’s motion
to compel Defendant’s responses to its Special Interrogatories, Set One, served
on Defendant on February 4, 2022. (Code
Civ. Proc., § 2030.290, subd. (b).)
The court grants Plaintiff’s
request for sanctions against Defendant.
(Code Civ. Proc., § 2030.290, subd. (c).) The court finds that $997.50 (2.5 hours x
$375 hourly rate + $60 filing fee) is a reasonable amount of monetary sanctions
to impose against Defendant in connection with this motion. (Rasiah Decl., ¶ 6.)
ORDER
The court grants plaintiff Consumer Advocacy Group, Inc.’s motion to
compel initial responses to special interrogatories, set one. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2030.290, subd.
(b).)
Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 2030.290, the court orders
defendant Midland Hardware Company No. 4 to serve on plaintiff Consumer
Advocacy Group, Inc. full and complete verified answers, without objections, to
plaintiff Consumer Advocacy Group, Inc.’s Special Interrogatories, Set One,
that comply with Code of Civil Procedure sections 2030.220 and 2030.250,
subdivisions (a) and (b), within 20 days of the date of service of this
order.¿¿¿
The court grants plaintiff Consumer Advocacy Group, Inc.’s request for
monetary sanctions against defendant Midland Hardware Company No. 4.¿ The court
orders defendant Midland Hardware Company No. 4 to pay monetary sanctions in
the amount of $997.50 to plaintiff Consumer Advocacy Group, Inc. within 30 days
of the date of service of this order.¿ (Code Civ. Proc., § 2030.290, subd.
(c).)¿¿¿
The
court orders plaintiff Consumer Advocacy Group, Inc. to give notice of
this ruling.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED:
_____________________________
Robert
B. Broadbelt III
Judge
of the Superior Court