Judge: Robert B. Broadbelt, Case: 21STCV07940, Date: 2024-11-06 Tentative Ruling

Tentative rulings are sometimes, but not always, posted. The purpose of posting a tentative ruling is to to help focus the argument. The posting of a tentative ruling is not an invitation for the filing of additional papers shortly before the hearing.



Case Number: 21STCV07940    Hearing Date: November 6, 2024    Dept: 53

Superior Court of California

County of Los Angeles – Central District

Department 53

 

 

alejandra garcia , et al.;

 

Plaintiffs,

 

 

vs.

 

 

city of los angeles , et al.;

 

Defendants.

Case No.:

21STCV07940

 

 

Hearing Date:

November 6, 2024

 

 

Time:

10:00 a.m.

 

 

 

[tentative] Order RE:

 

defendant’s motion to compel further responses to requests for production of documents

 

 

MOVING PARTY:                 Defendant City of Beverly Hills

 

RESPONDING PARTY:       Unopposed

Motion to Compel Further Responses to Requests for Production of Documents

The court considered the moving papers filed in connection with this motion.[1]  No opposition papers were filed.

DISCUSSION

Defendant City of Beverly Hills (“Defendant”) moves the court for an order (1) compelling plaintiff Aria Sonora Silva-Espinosa (“Plaintiff”) to serve further responses to Defendants’ Requests for Production of Documents, Set One, numbers 1-30, and (2) awarding monetary sanctions in favor of Defendant and against Plaintiff in the amount of $4,635.90.

 

The court denies Defendant’s motion to compel Plaintiff’s further response to Requests for Production of Documents, number 1 because that demand does not adequately designate the documents, tangible things, and electronically stored information to be copied by specifically describing each individual item or reasonably particularizing each category of item as required.  (Code Civ. Proc., § 2031.030, subd. (c)(1).)  

The court grants Defendant’s motion to compel Plaintiff’s further responses to Requests for Production of Documents, numbers 2-13, 15-27, and 30 because the objections in the responses to those demands are without merit.  (Code Civ. Proc., § 2031.310, subd. (a)(3).)

The court grants Defendant’s motion to compel Plaintiff’s responses to Request for Production of Documents, numbers 14 and 28 because Plaintiff did not serve responses to those demands.  (Code Civ. Proc., § 2031.300, subd. (b).)

The court denies Defendant’s motion to compel Plaintiff’s further response to Requests for Production of Documents, number 29 because that demand is unintelligible and does not identify where in the operative complaint that Plaintiff makes the alleged contention.

            The court grants Defendant’s request for monetary sanctions.  (Code Civ. Proc., § 2031.310, subd. (h).)  The court finds that $3,537 ((10 hours x $297 hourly rate) + (1.4 hours x $405 hourly rate)) is a reasonable amount of sanctions to impose against Plaintiff in connection with this motion.  (Smith Decl., ¶ 13.)

ORDER

            The court grants in part defendant City of Beverly Hills’s motion to compel further responses as follows.

            Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 2031.310, the court orders plaintiff Aria Sonora Silva-Espinosa (1) to serve on defendant City of Beverly Hills further written responses that comply with Code of Civil Procedure sections 2031.210-2031.250 to defendant City of Beverly Hills’s Requests for Production of Documents, numbers 2-13, 15-27, and 30, and (2) to produce to defendant City of Beverly Hills all documents and things in plaintiff Aria Sonora Silva-Espinosa’s possession, custody, or control, which are responsive to those requests, within 20 days of the date of service of this order.

            Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 2031.300, the court orders plaintiff Aria Sonora Silva-Espinosa (1) to serve on defendant City of Beverly Hills full and compete verified responses, without objections, and which comply with Code of Civil Procedure sections 2031.210-2031.250, to defendant City of Beverly Hills’s Requests for Production of Documents, numbers 14 and 28, and (2) to produce to defendant City of Beverly Hills all documents and things in plaintiff Aria Sonora Silva-Espinosa’s possession, custody, or control, which are responsive to those requests, within 20 days of the date of service of this order.

The court orders plaintiff Aria Sonora Silva-Espinosa to pay monetary sanctions to defendant City of Beverly Hills in the amount of $3,537 within 30 days of the date of service of this order.

            The court orders defendant City of Beverly Hills to give notice of this ruling.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 

DATED:  November 6, 2024

 

_____________________________

Robert B. Broadbelt III

Judge of the Superior Court



[1] On July 12, 2024, the court issued an order advancing the hearing on this motion from June 12, 2026 to November 6, 2024.  (July 12, 2024 Order, p. 2:8-12.)  Defendant City of Beverly Hills served a notice of the court’s ruling on plaintiff Aria Sonora Silva-Espinosa on the email address specified in the court’s order granting the motion to be relieved as her counsel.  (July 24, 2024 Notice of Ruling, pp. 10-13 [proof of service]; Oct. 12, 2023 Order Granting Attorney’s Motion to be Relieved as Counsel – Civil, ¶ 6 [stating last known email address].)