Judge: Robert B. Broadbelt, Case: 21STCV10685, Date: 2023-04-14 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 21STCV10685 Hearing Date: April 14, 2023 Dept: 53
Superior Court of California
County of Los Angeles – Central District
Department
53
|
vs. |
Case
No.: |
21STCV10685 |
|
|
|
|
|
Hearing
Date: |
April
14, 2023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[Tentative]
Order RE: (1)
petition
to approve compromise of claim on behalf of minor claimant ronald turcios (2)
petition
to approve compromise of claim on behalf of minor claimant miguel turcios,
jr. (3)
petition
to approve compromise of claim on behalf of minor claimant axel salazar |
||
MOVING PARTY: Plaintiff and petitioner Beatriz
Salazar
RESPONDING PARTY: Unopposed
(1)
Petition
to Approve Compromise of Claim on behalf of Minor Claimant Ronald Turcios
(2)
Petition
to Approve Compromise of Claim on behalf of Minor Claimant Miguel Turcios, Jr.
(3)
Petition
to Approve Compromise of Claim of behalf of Minor Claimant Axel Salazar
The court
considered the moving papers filed in connection with each petition. No opposition papers were filed.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Beatriz Salazar filed this breach of warranty of
habitability action against defendants Lisanto, LLC and Del Sol Property
Management, LLC on March 19, 2021, alleging eight causes of action for (1)
intentional breach of the warranty of habitability; (2) breach of covenant of
quiet enjoyment; (3) breach of covenant of quiet enjoyment; (4) tortious
negligence; (5) negligent supervision and retention; (6) reduction of housing
services in violation of Los Angeles Municipal Code; (7) collection of rent on
untenantable dwelling; and (8) unfair business practices.
Plaintiff and petitioner Beatriz Salazar (“Petitioner”) seeks court
approval of the settlements made on behalf of minor claimants Ronald Turcios, Miguel
Turcios, Jr., and Axel Salazar.
Petitioner has filed a proposed “Order
Approving Compromise of Claim or Action or Disposition of Proceeds of Judgment
for Minor or Person with Disability” (made on Judicial Council form MC-351) as
to each claimant as ordered by the court in its April 4, 2023 order.
Defendants Lisanto LLC and Del Sol Property Management have agreed to
pay a total of $230,000 to settle this action with Petitioner and each of the
minor claimants, of which $4,000 is allocated to each minor claimant.[1] (Pets., MC-350 Forms, ¶¶ 10, 11, 16,
Attachment 11b6.)
Of the $4,000 allocated to claimant Ronald Turcios, $1,000 will be
expended to replace clothing and furniture destroyed by fire and water
damage. (MC-350, ¶ 13, subd. (b).) In Attachment 13, Petitioner states that she
will spend $1,000 to replace all items damaged by fire and water, which
consists of “the majority of each minor claimants’ possessions.” (MC-350, Attachment 13.) Petitioner states that this “amount is only an
estimate” at this time, as she will purchase these items once she and claimant
have found a new home. (Ibid.) The remaining $3,000 will be paid or delivered
to Petitioner, without bond, which Petitioner will place in a bank account for use
by the minor claimant upon turning 18 years old. (MC-350, Attachment 18b(5).)
Of the $4,000 allocated to minor claimant Miguel Turcios Jr., $1,000
will be expended to replace clothing and furniture destroyed by fire and water
damage, which Petitioner will be purchasing in the future upon finding and
moving to a new home, as set forth above.
(MC-350, ¶ 13, subd. (b); MC-350, Attachment 13.) The remaining $3,000 will be paid or
delivered to Petitioner, without bond, which Petitioner will place in a bank
account for use by the minor claimant upon turning 18 years old. (MC-350, ¶ 16, subd. (b)(5); MC-350,
Attachment 18b(5).)
Of the $4,000 allocated to minor claimant Axel Salazar, $1,000 will be
expended to replace clothing and furniture destroyed by fire and water damage,
which Petitioner will be purchasing in the future upon finding and moving to a new
home, as set forth above. (MC-350, ¶ 13,
subd. (b); MC-350, Attachment 13.) The
remaining $3,000 will be paid or delivered to Petitioner, who will place the
money in a bank account for use by the minor claimant upon turning 18 years
old. (MC-350, ¶ 18, subd. (b)(5);
Attachment 18b(5).)
LEGAL STANDARD
The compromise of a minor’s disputed claim for damages is valid only
after it has been approved, upon the filing of a petition, by the court.
(Prob. Code, § 3500.) The petition must be verified by the petitioner,
must contain a full disclosure of all information that has any bearing upon the
reasonableness of the compromise, and must be prepared on judicial council form
MC-350. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 7.950.)
The
court has reviewed the petitions and finds the settlement to be fair and
reasonable, and in the best interests of minor claimants Ronald Turcios, Miguel
Turcios, Jr., and Axel Salazar.
The
court notes that no attorney’s fees are requested.
The court grants plaintiff
and petitioner Beatriz Salazar’s (1) petition to approve the compromise of
claim for minor claimant Ronald Turcios, (2) petition to approve the compromise
of claim for minor claimant Miguel Turcios Jr., and (3) petition to approve the
compromise of claim for minor claimant Axel Salazar.
The court sets an Order to
Show Cause re filing of Receipt and
Acknowledgment of Order for the Deposit of Money into Blocked Account (Judicial
Council Form MC-356) as
to three minor claimants for hearing on ___________________, 2023, at 8:30
a.m., in Department 53.
The court orders plaintiffs to
file a Notice of Settlement of Entire Case (Judicial Council Form CM-200) no
later than ___________________, 2023.
The court orders plaintiff and
petitioner Beatriz Salazar to give notice of this ruling.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED:
_____________________________
Robert
B. Broadbelt III
Judge
of the Superior Court
[1]
The court notes that the petitions mistakenly state that Defendants have agreed
to pay $230,000 to each of the minor claimants.
(MC-350 Forms, ¶ 10 [“To settle the claim in 3a or 3b, the defendants
named below have offered to pay the following amounts to the claimant”]
[emphasis added].) The court evaluates
the merits of the petitions because the petitions set forth the terms of the
settlement in field 11, subdivision (5) and Attachments 11b6.