Judge: Robert B. Broadbelt, Case: 22STCP00479, Date: 2022-08-17 Tentative Ruling
Tentative rulings are sometimes, but not always, posted. The purpose of posting a tentative ruling is to to help focus the argument. The posting of a tentative ruling is not an invitation for the filing of additional papers shortly before the hearing.
Case Number: 22STCP00479 Hearing Date: August 17, 2022 Dept: 53
Superior Court of California
County of Los Angeles – Central District
Department
53
|
vs. |
Case
No.: |
22STCP00479 |
|
|
|
|
|
Hearing
Date: |
August
17, 2022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[Tentative]
Order RE: plaintiff’s motion to compel deposition of
george bastrmajyan |
||
MOVING PARTY: Plaintiff Shawne Merriman, individually
and on behalf of Lights Out Xtreme Fighting, Inc.
RESPONDING PARTIES: Defendants and Cross-Complainants Lights
Out Xtreme Fighting, Inc., Steven Bash, and George Bastrmajyan
Motion to Compel Deposition of George Bastrmajyan
The court
considered the moving, opposition, and reply papers filed in connection with
this motion.
Plaintiff Shawne Merriman,
individually and on behalf of Lights Out Xtreme Fighting, Inc. (“Plaintiff”),
moves the court for an order (1) compelling defendant George Bastrmajyan a/k/a
Gevork Bastrmajyan (“Defendant”) to appear for deposition; (2) compelling
Defendant to produce the documents requested in the notice of deposition; and
(3) ordering Defendant to pay to Plaintiff the reasonable costs and attorney’s
fees incurred in filing this motion.
The court grants Plaintiff’s
motion to compel the deposition of Defendant.
(Code Civ. Proc., § 2025.450, subd. (a).)
Plaintiff has submitted
evidence that Defendant has not selected a mutually agreeable date, time, and
location for Defendant’s deposition, and did not appear for noticed deposition
before removing this case to federal court.
(McGuire Decl., ¶¶ 5-10.) Defendant,
in opposition, does not propose a date for deposition or otherwise indicate
that he intends to appear for any noticed deposition, instead arguing that
Plaintiff is unlikely to succeed on the merits of his claims and that a stay of
discovery is proper. The court finds
that Defendant has not presented valid reasons or evidence in support of any
request for the court to stay discovery.
The court therefore grants Plaintiff’s request to compel the deposition
of Defendant.
Second, the court finds that Plaintiff
has shown good cause justifying the production of the documents requested in
Plaintiff’s notice of deposition and therefore orders Defendant to produce the
documents specified in the notice of deposition.
Third, the court denies
Plaintiff’s request for attorney’s fees and costs on the motion because the
motion is not accompanied by a declaration setting forth facts supporting the
amount of the monetary sanction sought.
(Code Civ. Proc., § 2023.040.)
ORDER
The
court grants plaintiff Shawne Merriman’s motion to compel the deposition of
George Bastrmajyan, a/k/a Gevork G. Bastrmajyan. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2025.450.)
The court orders defendant
George Bastrmajyan a/k/a Gevork Bastrmajyan (1) to attend and testify at a
deposition to be taken by plaintiff Shawne Merriman on ___________________,
2022, at 10:00 a.m., at
5670 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1800, Los Angeles, California 90036, or other
location selected by Plaintiff, and (2) to produce for inspection at the
deposition the documents described in the deposition notice attached as
Exhibit 1 to the declaration of Daniel McGuire.
The court orders plaintiff
Shawne Merriman to give notice of this ruling.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED:
_____________________________
Robert
B. Broadbelt III
Judge
of the Superior Court