Judge: Robert B. Broadbelt, Case: 22STCV05861, Date: 2022-12-21 Tentative Ruling
Tentative rulings are sometimes, but not always, posted. The purpose of posting a tentative ruling is to to help focus the argument. The posting of a tentative ruling is not an invitation for the filing of additional papers shortly before the hearing.
Case Number: 22STCV05861 Hearing Date: December 21, 2022 Dept: 53
Superior Court of California
County of Los Angeles – Central District
Department
53
|
vs. |
Case
No.: |
22STCV05861 |
|
|
|
|
|
Hearing
Date: |
December
21, 2022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[Tentative]
Order RE: plaintiff’s motion for order compelling
responses to form interrogatories—unlawful detainer |
||
MOVING PARTY: Plaintiff 7 Melrose LLC
RESPONDING PARTY: Unopposed
Motion for Order Compelling Responses to Form Interrogatories—Unlawful
Detainer
The court
considered the moving papers filed in connection with this motion. No opposition papers were filed.
Plaintiff 7 Melrose, LLC (“Plaintiff”) moves
the court for an order (1) compelling defendant Jacques Fiorentino
(“Defendant”) to provide responses to Plaintiff’s Form Interrogatories—Unlawful
Detainer, without objections, and (2) awarding sanctions in favor of Plaintiff
and against Defendant in the amount of $960.
If a party to whom interrogatories are
directed fails to serve a timely response, the propounding party may move for
an order compelling response to the interrogatories. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2030.290, subd. (b).)
Plaintiff served its Form Interrogatories on
Defendant by overnight mail on July 21, 2022.[1] (Block
Decl., ¶ 2; Block Decl., Ex. 1.)
Defendant did not serve responses to this discovery. (Block Decl., ¶ 5.) Defendant has not filed opposition papers or other
evidence with the court establishing that responses have been served.
The court therefore grants Plaintiff’s
motion to compel Defendant’s responses to Plaintiff’s Form
Interrogatories. (Code Civ. Proc.,
§ 2030.290, subd. (b).)
The court grants Plaintiff’s request for
sanctions against Defendant. (Code Civ.
Proc., § 2030.290, subd. (c).) The court
finds that sanctions in the amount of $960 (2 hours x $450 hourly rate + $60
filing fee) is a reasonable amount of sanctions to impose against Defendant in
connection with this motion. (Block
Decl., ¶ 7.)
ORDER
The court grants plaintiff 7 Melrose, LLC’s
motion to compel responses to plaintiff’s form interrogatories.
Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 2030.290, the court orders
defendant Jacques Fiorentino to serve on plaintiff 7 Melrose, LLC full and
complete verified answers, without objections, to plaintiff 7 Melrose, LLC’s
Form Interrogatories—General, that comply with Code of Civil Procedure sections
2030.220 and 2030.250, subdivisions (a) and (b), within 30 days of the date of
service of this order.
The court grants plaintiff 7 Melrose, LLC’s request for monetary
sanctions against defendant Jacques Fiorentino. The court orders defendant
Jacques Fiorentino to pay monetary sanctions in the amount of $960 to plaintiff
7 Melrose, LLC within 30 days of the date of this order. (Code Civ.
Proc., § 2030.290, subd. (c).)
The court orders plaintiff 7 Melrose, LLC to give notice of this ruling.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED:
_____________________________
Robert
B. Broadbelt III
Judge
of the Superior Court
[1]
The court notes that, although Plaintiff asserts that it served “Form
Interrogatories—Unlawful Detainer” on Defendant, the exhibit attached to
Plaintiff’s motion establishes that Plaintiff served on Defendant “Form
Interrogatories—General.” (Block Decl.,
Ex. 1.) The court therefore considers
Plaintiff’s motion to request the court order Defendant serve responses to the
Form Interrogatories—General served by Plaintiff, as attached as Exhibit 1 to
the declaration of Dennis Block.