Judge: Robert B. Broadbelt, Case: 22STCV05861, Date: 2022-12-22 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 22STCV05861 Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 Dept: 53
Superior Court of California
County of Los Angeles – Central District
Department
53
|
vs. |
Case
No.: |
22STCV05861 |
|
|
|
|
|
Hearing
Date: |
December
22, 2022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[Tentative]
Order RE: plaintiff’s motion for order compelling
responses to first set of requests for admissions, deeming admissions
admitted, and for monetary sanctions |
||
MOVING PARTY: Plaintiff 7 Melrose, LLC
RESPONDING PARTY: Unopposed
Motion for Order Compelling Responses to First Set of Requests for
Admissions, Deeming Admissions Admitted, and for Monetary Sanctions
The court
considered the moving papers filed in connection with this motion. No opposition papers were filed.
DISCUSSION
Plaintiff 7 Melrose, LLC (“Plaintiff”) moves the
court for an order (1) that the truth of all matters and the genuineness of all
documents specified in Plaintiff’s Request for Admissions, served on defendant
Jacques Fiorentino (“Defendant”) on July 21, 2022, be deemed admitted, and (2)
awarding sanctions in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant in the amount of
$960.
If a party to whom requests for admissions
are directed fails to serve a timely response, the court shall, upon motion by
the propounding party, order the matters specified in the requests be deemed
admitted unless the court finds that the party to whom the requests for
admission have been directed has served substantially compliant responses
before the hearing on the motion.¿ (Code Civ. Proc., § 2033.280, subds. (b),
(c).)
Plaintiff served its First Set of Requests
for Admissions on Defendant by mail on July 21, 2022. (Block Decl., ¶ 2; Block Decl., Ex.
1.) Plaintiff asserts that Defendant has
not provided Plaintiff with any verified responses. (Block Decl., ¶ 3.) Defendant has not filed an opposition or
other papers with the court establishing that responses to Plaintiff’s Requests
for Admissions have been served.
Upon consideration of the evidence
submitted, the court finds that Defendant has not served responses to Plaintiff’s
Requests for Admissions and therefore grants Plaintiff’s motion. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2033.280, subds. (b), (c).)
The court grants Plaintiff’s request for
monetary sanctions against Defendant.
(Code Civ. Proc., § 2033.280, subd. (c).) The court finds that $960 (2 hours x $450 per
hour + $60 filing fee) is a reasonable amount of sanctions to impose against
Defendant in connection with this motion.
(Block Decl., ¶ 7.)
ORDER
The court grants plaintiff 7 Melrose, LLC’s
motion for order that the truth of all matters and the genuineness of all
documents specified in Plaintiff’s Request for Admissions be deemed admitted,
and for monetary sanctions.
The court orders that the truth of the
matters and the genuineness of all documents specified in plaintiff 7 Melrose,
LLC’s First Set of Requests for Admissions, served on defendant Jacques
Fiorentino on July 21, 2022, as attached as Exhibit 1 to the declaration of
Dennis P. Block, are deemed admitted.
(Code Civ. Proc., § 2033.280, subd. (b).)
The court orders defendant Jacques
Fiorentino to pay sanctions to plaintiff 7 Melrose, LLC in the amount of $960
within 30 days from the date of this order.
The court orders plaintiff 7 Melrose, LLC to give notice of this
ruling.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED:
_____________________________
Robert
B. Broadbelt III
Judge
of the Superior Court