Judge: Robert B. Broadbelt, Case: 22STCV08198, Date: 2024-03-04 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 22STCV08198 Hearing Date: March 4, 2024 Dept: 53
Superior Court of California
County of Los Angeles – Central District
Department
53
|
vs. |
Case
No.: |
22STCV08198 |
|
|
|
|
|
Hearing
Date: |
March
4, 2024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[Tentative]
Order RE: defendant’s motion to compel resumption of
deposition of plaintiff and for sanctions |
||
MOVING PARTY: Defendant College Hospital Inc.
RESPONDING PARTY: Plaintiff Rebecca Marshall
Motion to Compel Resumption of Deposition of Plaintiff and for
Sanctions
The court
considered the moving, opposition, and reply papers filed in connection with
this motion.
DISCUSSION
Defendant College Hospital Inc. (“Defendant”) moves the court for an order
(1) compelling plaintiff Rebecca Marshall (“Plaintiff”) to resume her
deposition, and (2) awarding sanctions in favor of Defendant and against
Plaintiff in the amount of $7,712.25.
“If, after service of a deposition notice, a party to the action . . .,
without having served a valid objection under Section 2025.410, fails to appear
for examination, or to proceed with it . . ., the party giving the notice may
move for an order compelling the deponent’s attendance and testimony . . . .” (Code Civ. Proc., § 2025.450, subd. (a).)
Defendant took Plaintiff’s deposition on August 25, 2023 and October
25, 2023. (Fox Decl., ¶¶ 9, 22.) Defendant asserts that, by the end of the
second session of Plaintiff’s deposition, while Defendant had completed its
questioning on various topics, it was unable to complete its questioning
regarding (1) Plaintiff’s claims for retaliation and wrongful termination, (2)
Plaintiff’s emotional distress damages, (3) the three witness declarations
produced by Plaintiff on October 20, 2023, and (4) Plaintiff’s handwritten
notes identified in the first session of her deposition. (Fox Decl., ¶ 24.) Thus, on November 6, 2023, Defendant served Plaintiff
with its Eighth Amended Notice of Deposition, setting Plaintiff’s third session
for November 20, 2023. (Fox Decl.,
¶ 25; Fox Decl., Ex. O.) Plaintiff
served an objection and amended objection on November 17, 2023, and did not
appear for deposition on November 20, 2023.
(Fox Decl., ¶¶ 27-30; Fox Decl., Ex. S [transcript of
nonappearance].) Defendant anticipates
completing Plaintiff’s deposition within a few hours or one-half of a day. (Mot., p. 14:23-26.)
The court finds that Defendant has shown good cause to compel
Plaintiff to attend and testify at a third session of her deposition so that
Defendant may question Plaintiff about her claims for retaliation, wrongful termination,
and emotional distress damages. (Fox
Decl., ¶ 24.)
The court notes that, in opposition, Plaintiff asserts that, in total,
she has been deposed for 15 hours and 9 minutes, which is beyond the acceptable
deposition time for a witness in a complex case. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2025.290, subd.
(b)(3).) There is no 14-hour time limit
for a witness in an employment action.
(Code Civ. Proc., § 2025.290, subd. (b)(4) [the deposition time limit
does not apply “[t]o any case brought by an employee or applicant for
employment against an employer for acts or omissions arising out of or relating
to the employment relationship”].) The
court further finds, based on Defendant’s representations that the third
session of Plaintiff’s deposition will be completed within a few hours and will
be taken for the purpose of questioning Plaintiff regarding the specific
categories of information set forth above, that Defendant’s conduct is not
harassing. However, the court will order
that the deposition shall last no more than four hours.
The court finds that the circumstances presented would make the
imposition of sanctions unjust and therefore denies Defendant’s request for an
award of monetary sanctions against Plaintiff.
(Code Civ. Proc., § 2025.450, subd. (g)(1).)
ORDER
The court grants in part defendant
College Hospital Inc.’s motion to compel resumption of deposition of plaintiff
Rebecca Marshall as follows.
The court orders plaintiff Rebecca
Marshall to appear for and testify at a deposition to be taken by counsel for
defendant College Hospital Inc., on a videoconference platform to be selected
by defendant College Hospital, Inc., within 30 days of the date of service of
this order. The court orders that the
deposition shall last no more than four hours.
The court denies defendant
College Hospital Inc.’s request for monetary sanctions.
The court orders defendant College Hospital, Inc. to give notice of
this ruling.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED:
_____________________________
Robert
B. Broadbelt III
Judge
of the Superior Court