Judge: Robert B. Broadbelt, Case: 22STCV23429, Date: 2024-03-04 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 22STCV23429 Hearing Date: March 4, 2024 Dept: 53
Superior Court of California
County of Los Angeles – Central District
Department
53
|
vs. |
Case
No.: |
22STCV23429 |
|
|
|
|
|
Hearing
Date: |
March
4, 2024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[Tentative]
Order RE: defendant’s motion to compel responses to
interrogatories |
||
MOVING PARTY: Defendant Vision Construction
Group, Inc.
RESPONDING PARTY: Unopposed
Motion to Compel Responses to Interrogatories
The court
considered the moving papers filed in connection with this motion. No opposition papers were filed.
DISCUSSION
Defendant Vision Construction Group, Inc. (“Defendant”) moves the
court for an order (1) compelling plaintiff Morillo Construction, Inc.
(“Plaintiff”) to serve responses to Defendant’s Form Interrogatories, and (2)
awarding sanctions in favor of Defendant and against Plaintiff in the amount of
$3,611.65.
If a party to whom interrogatories are directed fails to serve a
timely response, the propounding party may move for an order compelling
response to the interrogatories.¿ (Code Civ. Proc., § 2030.290, subd. (b).)¿
Defendant served Plaintiff with its Form Interrogatories –
Construction Litigation on November 17, 2022 by email. (Rothstein Decl., ¶ 2; Rothstein Decl., Ex. 1
[email to Plaintiff’s counsel], Ex. 2 [Form Interrogatories – Construction
Litigation].) Although Defendant’s
counsel granted Plaintiff’s counsel an extension to provide responses, Plaintiff
did not timely serve responses.
(Rothstein Decl., ¶¶ 6-9.)
Plaintiff had not served responses as of the date that Defendant filed
this motion. (Rothstein Decl.,
¶ 10.) Plaintiff has not filed
opposition papers or other evidence with the court establishing that responses
have since been served.
Thus, the court grants Defendant’s motion to compel Plaintiff’s
responses to Form Interrogatories – Construction Litigation. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2030.290, subd. (b).)
The court grants Defendant’s request for monetary sanctions against
Plaintiff. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2030.290,
subd. (c).) The court finds that
$1,549.15 ((2.5 hours x counsel’s $595 hourly rate) + $61.65 filing fee) is a
reasonable amount of sanctions to impose against Plaintiff in connection with
this motion. (Rothstein Decl.,
¶ 11.)
ORDER
The court grants defendant Vision Construction Group, Inc.’s motion to
compel responses to interrogatories.
Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 2030.290, the court orders
plaintiff Morillo Construction, Inc. to serve on defendant Vision Construction
Group, Inc. full and complete verified answers, without objections, to
defendant Vision Construction Group, Inc.’s Form Interrogatories – Construction
Litigation, that comply with Code of Civil Procedure sections
2030.220-2030.250, within 20 days of the date of service of this order.
The court grants defendant Vision Construction Group, Inc.’s request
for monetary sanctions.
The court orders plaintiff Morillo Construction, Inc. to pay sanctions
to defendant Vision Construction Group, Inc. in the amount of $1,549.15 within
30 days of the date of service of this order.
The court orders defendant Vision Construction Group, Inc. to give
notice of this ruling.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED:
_____________________________
Robert
B. Broadbelt III
Judge
of the Superior Court