Judge: Robert B. Broadbelt, Case: 22STCV28803, Date: 2024-08-26 Tentative Ruling

Tentative rulings are sometimes, but not always, posted. The purpose of posting a tentative ruling is to to help focus the argument. The posting of a tentative ruling is not an invitation for the filing of additional papers shortly before the hearing.

Case Number: 22STCV28803    Hearing Date: August 26, 2024    Dept: 53

Margaryan v. BMW of North America Inc., 22STCV28803

Ex Parte Application 8/26/24

The court finds that plaintiff has not satisfied the requirement of California Rules of Court, rule 3.1202, subdivision (c), that an applicant for an ex parte order must make an affirmative factual showing in a declaration containing competent testimony based on personal knowledge of irreparable harm, immediate danger, or other statutory basis for granting relief ex parte. 

The court does not find good cause to grant plaintiff’s request for an order shortening time on the hearing on plaintiff’s motion requesting leave to file plaintiff’s first amended complaint or to prescribe shorter times for the filing and service of papers than the times specified in Code of Civil Procedure section 1005, subdivision (b).  (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1300, subd. (b).)

The court does not find that plaintiff has shown good cause to continue the trial. 

The court therefore denies plaintiff’s ex parte application.

The court orders plaintiff to give notice of this order.