Judge: Robert B. Broadbelt, Case: 22STCV38301, Date: 2023-05-16 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 22STCV38301 Hearing Date: May 16, 2023 Dept: 53
Superior Court of California
County of Los Angeles – Central District
Department
53
|
vs. |
Case
No.: |
22STCV38301 |
|
|
|
|
|
Hearing
Date: |
May
16, 2023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[Tentative]
Order RE: plaintiff’s motion to seal 20 paragraphs of
amended complaint |
||
MOVING PARTY: Plaintiff Forex Express Corp.,
d/b/a Wirecash
RESPONDING PARTIES: Defendants Eliran Grushkowsky and Fernando
Fayzano
Motion to Seal 20 Paragraphs of Amended Complaint
The court
considered the moving, opposition, and reply papers filed in connection with
this motion.
DISCUSSION
Plaintiff Forex Express Corp., d/b/a Wirecash (“Plaintiff”) moves the
court for an order filing under seal 20 paragraphs of its Amended Complaint on
the ground that the information contained in those paragraphs consists of
Plaintiff’s confidential and proprietary business information. (Cooper Decl., ¶¶ 6, 9-10.)
Plaintiff filed a redacted version of its Amended Complaint with the
court on April 19, 2023. The court notes
that Plaintiff filed a “Notice of Lodging” on April 19, 2023, stating that
Plaintiff “intends to lodge” the redacted portions of the Amended Complaint
with the court. However, the court has
not received a lodged copy of the unredacted Amended Complaint. Thus, it does not appear that Plaintiff has
lodged the Amended Complaint conditionally under seal with court.
A “party requesting that a record be filed under seal must lodge it
with the court under [subdivision] (d) when the motion or application is made,
unless good cause exists for not lodging it or the record has previously been
lodged under [subdivision] (3)(A)(i).”
(Cal. Rules of Ct., rule 2.551, subd. (b)(4).) Plaintiff has not shown that there is good
cause not to lodge the unredacted version of the Amended Complaint, and it does
not appear that the Amended Complaint has been previously lodged.
The court therefore finds that Plaintiff has not complied with
California Rules of Court, rule 2.551 and denies Plaintiff’s motion to seal,
without prejudice to Plaintiff’s filing a new motion or application that fully
complies with rule 2.551.
ORDER
The court denies plaintiff
Forex Express Corp., d/b/a Wirecash’s motion to seal 20 paragraphs of amended
complaint without prejudice.
The court orders defendant
Eliran Grushkowsky to give notice of this ruling.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED:
_____________________________
Robert
B. Broadbelt III
Judge
of the Superior Court