Judge: Robert B. Broadbelt, Case: 23STCV03655, Date: 2024-05-02 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 23STCV03655 Hearing Date: May 2, 2024 Dept: 53
Superior Court of California
County of Los Angeles – Central District
Department
53
|
vs. |
Case
No.: |
23STCV03655 |
|
|
|
|
|
Hearing
Date: |
May
2, 2024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[tentative]
Order RE: (1)
plaintiff’s
motion to compel responses to form interrogatories – general (2)
plaintiff’s
motion to compel responses to special interrogatories (3)
plaintiff’s
motion to compel responses to request for production of documents (4)
plaintiff’s
motion for order deeming admitted truth of facts |
||
MOVING PARTY: Plaintiff Selleton.com
RESPONDING PARTY: Unopposed
(1)
Motion
to Compel Responses to Form Interrogatories – General
(2)
Motion
to Compel Responses to Special Interrogatories
(3)
Motion
to Compel Responses to Requests for Production of Documents
(4)
Motion
for Order Deeming Admitted Truth of Facts
The court
considered the moving papers filed in connection with each motion. No opposition papers were filed.
MOTION TO COMPEL RESPONSES TO FORM
INTERROGATORIES
Plaintiff Selleton.com (“Plaintiff”) moves the court for an order (1)
compelling defendant MDI Spray Systems, Inc. (“Defendant”) to serve responses
to Plaintiff’s Form Interrogatories, Set One, and (2) awarding monetary
sanctions in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant in the amount $1,252.
If
a party to whom interrogatories are directed fails to serve a timely response,
the propounding party may move for an order compelling response to the
interrogatories.¿ (Code Civ. Proc., § 2030.290, subd. (b).)¿¿
Plaintiff served Defendant with its Form Interrogatories – General,
Set One, on June 20, 2023 by mail.
(Miller Decl., ¶ 2; Miller Decl., Ex. A.) Defendant (1) did not serve timely responses,
(2) did not serve responses by the extension date of August 25, 2023, and (3)
had not served responses as of the date that Plaintiff filed this motion. (Miller Decl., ¶¶ 3-5.) Defendant has not filed an opposition or
other evidence with the court establishing that responses have since been
served.
The court therefore grants Plaintiff’s motion. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2030.290, subd.
(b).)
The court grants Plaintiff’s request for monetary sanctions. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2030.290, subd. (c).) The court finds that $587 ((1.5 hours x $350
hourly rate) + $62 filing fee) is a reasonable amount of sanctions to impose
against Defendant in connection with this motion. (Miller Decl., ¶¶ 6-7.)
MOTION TO COMPEL RESPONSES TO SPECIAL
INTERROGATORIES
Plaintiff moves the court for
an order (1) compelling Defendant to serve responses to Plaintiff’s Special
Interrogatories, Set One, and (2) awarding monetary sanctions in favor of
Plaintiff and against Defendant in the amount of $1,252.
If
the party to whom interrogatories are directed fails to serve a timely
response, the propounding party may move for an order compelling response to
the interrogatories.¿ (Code Civ. Proc., §¿2030.290, subd. (b).)¿¿¿
Plaintiff served Defendant
with its Special Interrogatories, Set One, on June 20, 2023 by mail. (Miller Decl., Ex. A.) Defendant did not timely serve responses to
the interrogatories, nor did Defendant serve responses by the extension granted
by Plaintiff’s counsel. (Miller Decl.,
¶¶ 3-4.) Defendant had not served responses
as of the date that Plaintiff filed this motion. (Miller Decl., ¶ 5.) Defendant has not filed an opposition or other
evidence with the court establishing that responses have since been
served.
The court therefore grants Plaintiff’s motion. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2030.290, subd.
(b).)
The court grants Plaintiff’s request for monetary sanctions. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2030.290, subd. (c).) The court finds that $587 ((1.5 hours x $350
hourly rate) + $62 filing fee) is a reasonable amount of sanctions to impose
against Defendant in connection with this motion. (Miller Decl., ¶¶ 6-7.)
MOTION TO COMPEL RESPONSES TO REQUESTS
FOR PRODUCTION
Plaintiff moves the court for
an order (1) compelling Defendant to serve responses to Plaintiff’s Requests
for Production of Documents, Set One, and (2) awarding monetary sanctions in
favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant in the amount of $1,567.
If
a party to whom a demand for inspection is directed fails to serve a timely
response, the party making the demand may move for an order compelling response
to the demand.¿ (Code Civ. Proc., §¿2031.300, subd. (b).)
Plaintiff
served Defendant with its Requests for Production of Documents, Set One, by
mail on June 20, 2023. (Miller Decl.,
Ex. A.) Defendant (1) did not timely
serve responses, (2) did not serve responses by the extension
granted by Plaintiff’s counsel, and (3) had not served responses as of the date
that Plaintiff filed this motion.
(Miller Decl., ¶¶ 3-5.)
The court
therefore grants Plaintiff’s motion.
(Code Civ. Proc., § 2031.300, subd. (b).)
The court
grants Plaintiff’s request for monetary sanctions. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2031.300, subd.
(c).) The court finds that
$762 ((2 hours x $350 hourly rate) + $62 filing fee) is a reasonable amount of
sanctions to impose against Defendant in connection with this motion. (Miller Decl., ¶¶ 6-7.)
MOTION FOR ORDER DEEMING ADMITTED TRUTH
OF FACTS
Plaintiff moves the court for an order (1) deeming admitted the truth
of the matters specified in its Requests for Admission, Set One served on
Defendant, and (2) awarding monetary sanctions in favor of Plaintiff and
against Defendant in the amount of $1,357.
If
a party to whom requests for admission are directed fails to serve a timely
response, the court shall, upon motion by the propounding party, order that the
matters specified in the requests be deemed admitted, unless the court finds
that the party to whom the requests for admission have been directed has
served, before the hearing on the motion, a proposed response that is in
substantial compliance with Code of Civil Procedure section 2033.220.¿ (Code
Civ. Proc., § 2033.280, subds. (b), (c).)
Plaintiff
served Defendant with its Requests for Admission, Set One, on June 20, 2023 by
mail. (Miller Decl., Ex. A.) Defendant did not serve timely serve
responses and had not served responses as of the date that Plaintiff filed this
motion. (Miller Decl.,
¶¶ 3-5.) Defendant has not filed an
opposition to this motion or other evidence with the court establishing that
responses in substantial compliance with Code of Civil Procedure section
2033.220 have since been served.
Thus,
the court finds that Defendant has not served responses to Plaintiff’s Requests
for Admission, Set One, and therefore grants Plaintiff’s motion. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2033.280, subds.
(b), (c).)
The
court grants Plaintiff’s request for monetary sanctions. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2033.280, subd.
(c).) The court finds that $657 ((1.7
hours x $350 hourly rate) + $62 filing fee) is a reasonable amount of sanctions
to impose against Defendant in connection with this motion. (Miller Decl., ¶¶ 6-7.)
ORDER
The court grants plaintiff
Selleton.com’s motion to compel responses to form interrogatories.
Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure
section 2030.290, the court orders defendant MDI Spray Systems, Inc. to serve
on plaintiff Selleton.com full and complete verified answers, without
objections, to plaintiff Selleton.com’s Form Interrogatories – General, Set
One, that comply with Code of Civil Procedures sections 2030.220-2030.250,
within 20 days of the date of service of this order.
The court grants plaintiff Selleton.com’s motion to compel
responses to special interrogatories.
Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure
section 2030.290, the court orders defendant MDI Spray Systems, Inc. to serve
on plaintiff Selleton.com full and complete verified answers, without
objections, to plaintiff Selleton.com’s Special Interrogatories, Set One, that
comply with Code of Civil Procedures sections 2030.220-2030.250, within 20 days
of the date of service of this order.
The court grants plaintiff Selleton.com’s motion to compel
responses to requests for production of documents.
Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 2031.300, the court orders
defendant MDI Spray Systems, Inc. (1) to serve on plaintiff Selleton.com full
and complete verified responses, without objections, to plaintiff
Selleton.com’s Requests for Production of Documents, Set One, that comply with
Code of Civil Procedure sections 2031.210-2031.250, and (2) to produce to
plaintiff Selleton.com all documents and things in defendant MDI Spray Systems,
Inc.’s possession, custody, or control which are responsive to those requests,
within 20 days of the date of service of this order.
The court grants plaintiff Selleton.com’s motion for order
deeming admitted truth of facts.
Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 2033.280, subdivision (b),
the court orders that the truth of the matters and the genuineness of all
documents specified in plaintiff Selleton.com’s Requests for Admission, Set
One, served on defendant MDI Spray Systems, Inc. on June 20, 2023, are deemed
admitted.
The court grants plaintiff Selleton.com’s requests for monetary
sanctions.
The court orders defendant MDI Spray Systems, Inc. to pay monetary
sanctions to plaintiff Selleton.com in the total amount of $2,593 within 30
days of the date of service of this order.
The court orders plaintiff
Selleton.com to give notice of this ruling.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED:
_____________________________
Robert
B. Broadbelt III
Judge
of the Superior Court