Judge: Robert B. Broadbelt, Case: 23STCV14947, Date: 2025-04-23 Tentative Ruling

Case Number: 23STCV14947    Hearing Date: April 23, 2025    Dept: 53

Superior Court of California

County of Los Angeles – Central District

Department 53

 

 

lawrence m. markey, jr. ;

 

Plaintiff,

 

 

vs.

 

 

catherine p. gamez ;

 

Defendant.

Case No.:

23STCV14947

 

 

Hearing Date:

April 23, 2025

 

 

Time:

10:00 a.m.

 

 

 

[tentative] Order RE:

 

plaintiff’s motion for judgment against garnishee

 

 

MOVING PARTY:                 Plaintiff Lawrence M. Markey, Jr.    

 

RESPONDING PARTY:       Unopposed

Motion for Judgment Against Garnishee

The court considered the moving papers filed in connection with this motion.  No opposition papers were filed.

DISCUSSION

Plaintiff Lawrence M. Markey Jr. (“Plaintiff”) filed this action against defendant Catherine P. Gamez (“Defendant”) on June 26, 2023. 

The clerk entered Defendant’s default on January 2, 2024.  Thereafter, on January 26, 2024, the court entered default judgment in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant in the amount of $58,928.  (Jan. 26, 2024 JUD-100, ¶¶ 5-6.)

Plaintiff now requests that the court enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff and against third-party Ryan Garcia (“Garcia”) in the amount of $15,000.

The court finds that Plaintiff has not shown that he properly served Garcia with the moving papers filed in connection with this motion.

The proof of service of this motion, filed on August 8, 2024, states that Garcia was served with the pending motion by mail, “c/o KingRy, Inc.” at the address 1880 Century Park East, Suite 950, Los Angeles, California, 90067.  (Aug. 8, 2024 POS-030, ¶¶ 3, 4, subd. (a), 5.)  However, Garcia has not made an appearance in this action (as he is not a party).  Thus, the court cannot verify that the address of service of the moving papers by mail is Garcia’s address of record.  If Plaintiff is seeking relief against Garcia in this action, Plaintiff must serve Garcia with any motion seeking such relief in the same manner required for service of summons.

The court therefore denies Plaintiff’s motion, without prejudice to Plaintiff’s filing a new motion seeking relief against Garcia that is accompanied by a valid proof of service.

ORDER

            The court denies, without prejudice, plaintiff Lawrence M. Markey, Jr.’s motion for judgment against garnishee.

            The court orders plaintiff Lawrence M. Markey, Jr. to give notice of this ruling.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 

DATED:  April 23, 2025

 

_____________________________

Robert B. Broadbelt III

Judge of the Superior Court





Website by Triangulus