Judge: Robert B. Broadbelt, Case: 24STCP00317, Date: 2024-06-18 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 24STCP00317 Hearing Date: June 18, 2024 Dept: 53
Superior Court of California
County of Los Angeles – Central District
Department
53
|
Petitioner, vs. Respondents. |
Case
No.: |
24STCP00317 |
|
|
|
|
|
Hearing
Date: |
June
18, 2024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[tentative]
Order RE: petitioner’s motion to compel responses to
special interrogatories |
||
MOVING PARTY: Petitioner Wawanesa General
Insurance Company
RESPONDING PARTY: Unopposed
Motion to Compel Responses to Special Interrogatories
The court
considered the moving papers filed in connection with this motion. No opposition papers were filed.
DISCUSSION
Petitioner Wawanesa General Insurance Company (“Petitioner”) moves the
court for an order (1) compelling respondent Analilia Chavez (“Chavez”) to
provide verified responses to Petitioner’s Special Interrogatories, Set One,
and (2) awarding monetary sanctions in favor of Petitioner and against
respondent Chavez in the amount of $1,565.
The court orders that Petitioner’s motion is taken off calendar because
Petitioner (1) has not properly served respondent Chavez with the Petition, and
(2) did not give Chavez sufficient notice of this motion.
First, the court notes that the proof of service attached to the
Petition appears to be defective.
Petitioner filed its Petition for Superior Court Case Number for the
Purpose of Discovery with the court on January 31, 2024, naming as respondents
Chavez and Michel Esquivel (collectively, “Respondents”) pursuant to Insurance
Code section 11580.2. (Pet., ¶¶ 2,
3.) Pursuant to that statute, the court
has jurisdiction to hear discovery matters that arise in uninsured motorist
arbitrations. (Ins. Code, § 11580.2,
subd. (f)(1); Miranda v. 21st Century Ins. Co. (2004) 117 Cal.App.4th
913, 926 [“the uninsured motorist law grants the superior court the exclusive
jurisdiction to hear discovery matters arising under uninsured motorist
arbitrations”] [emphasis in original].) However, Petitioner did not serve Respondents
with the Petition in the same manner as a summons.
The proof of service states that the Petition was served, by mail and
electronic service, on “Robert Bazikyan, Esq.”
(Pet., pp. 4-5 [Proof of Service].) The proof of service does not state that
Respondents were served with the Petition, and the Petition does not present
evidence establishing that Robert Bazikyan was authorized to accept service on
behalf of Respondents. To the extent
that the court may construe the proof of service as establishing that
Petitioner served counsel for Respondents with the Petition, Petitioner did not
cite authority establishing that service of its Petition by mail and electronic
service is proper pursuant to Insurance Code section 11580.2.
Thus, it appears that Petitioner has not served Respondents with its
Petition by a valid method of service.
Second, even if this manner of service were valid, the court finds
that Petitioner did not provide Chavez with sufficient notice of the hearing on
this motion.
“[A]ll moving and supporting papers shall be served and filed at least
16 court days before the hearing.” (Code
Civ. Proc., § 1005, subd. (b).) Any
period of notice “shall be extended after service by electronic means by two
court days . . . .” (Code Civ. Proc., §
1010.6, subd. (a)(3)(B).)
For a hearing date of June 18, 2024, Petitioner was required to serve
Chavez by, at least, May 22, 2024 (16 court days + 2 court days for electronic
service).[1] Petitioner served Chavez with the pending
motion by electronic service and by mail on May 23, 2024, i.e., one court day
late. Moreover, Chavez did not file an
opposition to this motion. Thus,
Petitioner did not give Chavez sufficient notice of the hearing on this
motion. (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 1005, subd.
(b), 1010.6, subd. (a)(3)(B).)
The court therefore orders that the hearing on Petitioner’s motion to
compel responses to special interrogatories is taken off calendar, subject to
being rescheduled after Petitioner properly serves Chavez with the Petition.
ORDER
The court orders that the hearing on petitioner Wawanesa General
Company’s motion to compel responses to special interrogatories is taken off
calendar, subject to being rescheduled after petitioner Wawanesa General
Company properly serves respondent Analilia Chavez with the Petition.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED:
_____________________________
Robert
B. Broadbelt III
Judge
of the Superior Court