Judge: Robert B. Broadbelt, Case: 24STCV04499, Date: 2025-02-10 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 24STCV04499 Hearing Date: February 10, 2025 Dept: 53
Superior Court of California
County of Los Angeles – Central District
Department
53
|
vs. |
Case
No.: |
24STCV04499 |
|
|
|
|
|
Hearing
Date: |
February
10, 2025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[tentative]
Order RE: plaintiff’s motion to substitute deceased
defendant’s successor in interest |
||
MOVING PARTY: Plaintiff Investor Partners,
LLC
RESPONDING PARTY: Unopposed
Motion to Substitute Deceased Defendant’s Successor in Interest
The court
considered the moving papers filed in connection with this motion. No opposition papers were filed.
DISCUSSION
Plaintiff Investor Partners, LLC (“Plaintiff”) moves the court for an
order substituting Linda Ginoza-Grovier (“Ginoza-Grovier”) in place of deceased
defendant Harry Ginoza[1]
(“Decedent”) as Decedent’s successor in interest.
“On motion, the court shall allow a pending action or proceeding
against the decedent that does not abate to be continued against the decedent’s
personal representative or, to the extent provided by statute, against the
decedent’s successor in interest, except that the court may not permit an
action or proceeding to be continued against the personal representative unless
proof of compliance with Part 4 (commencing with Section 9000) of Division 7 of
the Probate Code governing creditor claims is first made.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 377.41.) “‘[D]ecedent’s successor in interest’ means
the beneficiary of the decedent’s estate or other successor in interest who
succeeds to a cause of action or to a particular item of the property that is
the subject of a cause of action.” (Code
Civ. Proc., § 377.11.)
Plaintiff has submitted a copy of the filing entitled “Plaintiff’s
Motion re Substitution of Decedent’s Successor in Interest,” filed by Ginoza-Grovier
on behalf of Decedent in Case No. 23STCV08246,[2]
and the “Declaration of Linda Ginoza-Grovier as Successor in Interest to
Substitute in for Deceased Plaintiff Pursuant to CCP Section 377.32,” filed in
support of the motion for substitution of successor in interest in Case No.
23STCV08246. (Young Decl., Exs. 1-2.) Ginoza-Grovier stated, in her supporting
declaration, that (1) Decedent passed away on October 15, 2023; (2) Ginoza-Grovier
is one of the successors in interest to the estate of Decedent within the
meaning of Code of Civil Procedure section 377.11, and (3) Ginoza-Grovier was
“authorized by the other successors in interest to act as successor trustee of
the trust of [Decedent] to act on their behalf in the above-entitled
proceeding.” (Young Decl., Ex. 2,
Ginoza-Grovier Decl., ¶¶ 2, 4, 5.) Thus, Ginoza-Grovier requested to substitute
in as a plaintiff on behalf of Decedent in his action to quiet title to his
property. (Young Decl., Ex. 2, Ginoza
Grovier Decl., p. 1:23-28.)
The court finds that Plaintiff has submitted evidence showing that it
may continue this action against Ginoza-Grovier as Decedent’s successor in
interest because (1) Ginoza-Grovier has stated that she is one of the
successors in interest to Decedent’s estate and succeeded to his interest in
the case filed by Decedent (Case No. 23STCV08246), and (2) both Case No.
23STCV08246, filed by Decedent, and this action, filed by Plaintiff, concern
the same real property, such that the declaration of Ginoza-Grovier also
appears to show that she has “succeed[ed] . . . to a particular item of the
property that is the subject of a cause of action” in Plaintiff’s
Complaint. (Code Civ. Proc. ,§§ 377.11,
377.41; Young Decl., Ex. 2, Ginoza-Grovier Decl., p. 1:23-28 and ¶¶ 4-6; Pl.
Compl., ¶ 3 [subject property is 3234 Larissa Drive, Los Angeles, California,
90026]; Case No. 23STCV08246 Compl., ¶ 1 [defining subject property to be
3234-3236 Larissa Drive, Los Angeles, California, 90026].) The court therefore grants Plaintiff’s
motion. (Code Civ. Proc., § 377.41.)
ORDER
The court grants plaintiff Investor
Partners, LLC’s motion to substitute deceased defendant’s successor in interest.
The court orders that (1) Linda
Ginoza-Grovier shall be substituted as the successor in interest for defendant
Harry Ginoza (deceased) in this action, and (2) this action shall be continued
against Linda Ginoza-Grovier as the successor in interest for defendant Harry
Ginoza (deceased).
The court orders plaintiff Investor Partners, LLC to file a Notice of
Related Case in Case No. 23STCV08246 no later than February 19, 2025.
The court orders plaintiff Investor
Partners, LLC to give notice of this ruling.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED:
_____________________________
Robert
B. Broadbelt III
Judge
of the Superior Court
[1]
Plaintiff lodged an Amendment to Complaint on February 26, 2024, in which Plaintiff
corrected Defendant’s name. The court
entered an order approving the amendment on March 3, 2024.
[2] Plaintiff
filed a Notice of Related Case in this action on July 14, 2024, identifying
Case No. 23STCV08246 as a related case.
(June 14, 2024 Notice of Related Case, ¶ 1.) It does not appear, however, that Plaintiff
filed a Notice of Related Case in that case as required. (Cal. Rules of Ct., rule 3.300, subd. (d)
[“The Notice of Related Case must be filed in all pending cases listed in the
notice and must be served on all parties in those cases”].)