Judge: Robert B. Broadbelt, Case: 24STCV05592, Date: 2025-02-06 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 24STCV05592 Hearing Date: February 6, 2025 Dept: 53
Superior Court of California
County of Los Angeles – Central District
Department
53
vs. |
Case
No.: |
24STCV05592 |
|
|
|
Hearing
Date: |
February
6, 2025 |
|
|
|
|
Time: |
|
|
|
|
|
[tentative]
Order RE: plaintiff’s motion to deem admissions
admitted and for sanctions |
MOVING PARTY: Plaintiff Trinton Hurt
RESPONDING PARTY: Unopposed
Motion to Deem Admissions Admitted and for Sanctions
The court
considered the moving papers filed in connection with this motion. No opposition papers were filed.
DISCUSSION
Plaintiff Trinton Hurt (“Plaintiff”) moves the court for an order (1)
deeming admitted the truth of the matters specified in Plaintiff’s Requests for
Admission, Set One, served on defendant 2515 Thurman LLC (“Defendant”), and (2)
awarding sanctions in favor of Plaintiff in the amount of $970.
The court finds that Plaintiff has not shown that he served the
subject Requests for Admission and motion to deem the truth of the matters
specified therein admitted on Defendant at the correct address as required.
Plaintiff has submitted a proof of service stating that Defendant was
served with the Requests for Admission by mail on November 14, 2024, at the
address 850 Monterey Blvd., Apt. 1, Hermosa Beach, California. (Greer Decl., Ex. B, p. 2.) Plaintiff
served Defendant with this motion by mail on December 27, 2024, at the same
address. ( Dec. 27, 2024 Proof of
Service, p. 2.) However, as of the date
of service of the discovery and the pending motion, Defendant had not—and still
has not—made an appearance in this action, such that there is no address of
record for Defendant. Thus, the court
cannot verify that Plaintiff properly served Defendant with the subject
discovery and motion by mail at its address of record. Further, although counsel for Plaintiff has
stated that the discovery was served on “Defendant’s agent for service of
process[,]” counsel did not submit evidence in support of that assertion. (Greer Decl., ¶ 3.)
For the reasons set forth above, the court (1) finds that Plaintiff
has not shown that he properly served Defendant with the Requests for
Admission, Set One, and the pending motion, and therefore (2) denies
Plaintiff’s motion.
ORDER
The court denies plaintiff Trinton
Hurt’s motion to deem admissions admitted and for sanctions.
The court orders plaintiff Trinton
Hurt to give notice of this ruling.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED:
_____________________________
Robert
B. Broadbelt III
Judge
of the Superior Court