Judge: Robert B. Broadbelt, Case: BC716112, Date: 2025-02-14 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: BC716112 Hearing Date: February 14, 2025 Dept: 53
Superior Court of California
County of Los Angeles – Central District
Department
53
|
vs. |
Case
No.: |
BC716112 |
|
|
|
|
|
Hearing
Date: |
February
14, 2025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[tentative]
Order RE: plaintiff’s motion for order establishing
admissions and for monetary sanctions |
||
MOVING PARTY: Plaintiff Manoucher Sarbaz
RESPONDING PARTY: Unopposed
Motion for Order Establishing Admissions and for Monetary Sanctions.
The court
considered the moving papers filed in connection with this motion.
The court
considered the opposition papers filed on February 13, 2025 for the limited
purpose of establishing whether responses to the subject Requests for Admission
have been served before the hearing on this motion. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2033.280, subd. (c).)
DISCUSSION
Plaintiff Manoucher Sarbaz (“Plaintiff”) moves the court for an order
(1) deeming admitted the truth of the matters in the Requests for Admission,
Set One served on defendant Shahram Elyaszadeh (“Defendant”), and (2) awarding
monetary sanctions in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant in the amount of
$1,060.
If a party to whom requests for admission are directed fails to serve
a timely response, the court shall, upon motion by the propounding party, order
that the matters specified in the requests be deemed admitted, unless the court
finds that the party to whom the requests for admission have been directed has
served, before the hearing on the motion, a proposed response that is in
substantial compliance with Code of Civil Procedure section 2033.220.¿ (Code
Civ. Proc., § 2033.280, subds. (b), (c).)¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿
Plaintiff served Defendant with the Requests for Admission, Set One,
by email on June 3, 2024. (Gilchrest
Decl., Ex. B.) Defendant did not serve
timely responses to the Requests for Admission and had not served responses as
of the date that Plaintiff filed this motion.
(Gilchrest Decl., ¶ 3.) On
February 13, 2024, Defendant submitted an opposition to this motion, in which
Defendant submitted evidence showing that he served, on February 12, 2025,
verified responses to the Requests for Admission that are the subject of this
motion. (Sugars Decl., Ex. 1.)
The court therefore denies Plaintiff’s motion to deem admitted the
truth of the matters specified in Plaintiff’s Request for Admissions, Set
One. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2033.280,
subds. (b), (c).)¿¿¿
The court grants Plaintiff’s request for monetary sanctions. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2033.280, subd.
(c).) The court finds that $735 ((1.5
hours x $450 hourly rate) + $60 filing fee) is a reasonable amount of monetary
sanctions to impose against Defendant in connection with this motion. (Gilchrest Decl., ¶ 7.)
ORDER
The court grants in part plaintiff
Manoucher Sarbaz’s motion for order establishing admissions and for sanctions
as follows.
The court orders defendant Shahram
Elyaszadeh to pay monetary sanctions to plaintiff Manoucher Sarbaz in the
amount of $735 within 30 days of the date of this order.
The court orders plaintiff Manoucher
Sarbaz to give notice of this ruling.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED:
_____________________________
Robert
B. Broadbelt III
Judge
of the Superior Court