Judge: Robert S. Draper, Case: 20STCV09639, Date: 2023-02-15 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 20STCV09639 Hearing Date: February 15, 2023 Dept: 78
Superior Court of
California
County of Los Angeles
Department 78
|
IRMA RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiff, vs. DIRECT
THERAPY S&P CORP., et al., Defendants. |
Case
No.: |
20STCV09639 |
|
Hearing
Date: |
February
15, 2023 |
|
|
|
||
|
[TENTATIVE]
RULING RE: ATTORNEYs michael dawe and Brian D. Cronin’s motion
to be relieved as counsel for defendants direct therapy s&p corporation
and isaac archer. |
||
Attorneys Michael Dawe and Brian D. Cronin’s Motion to be
Relieved as Counsel for Defendants Direct Therapy S&P Corporation and Isaac
Archer is GRANTED.
Factual
background
This is action for wrongful discharge. The
Complaint alleges as follows. Plaintiff Irma Rodriguez (“Rodriguez”) was
employed by defendant Direct Therapy S&P, Corporation (“DT”) as a speech therapist
for children. (Compl. ¶ 8.) DT scheduled Rodriguez’s home therapy appointments
very close together, such that she did not have sufficient travel time between
appointments and was frequently late. (Ibid.) The heavy scheduling caused
stress and anxiety that aggravated her depression and anxiety. (Ibid.) She
wrote to DT management by text about this issue on October 18, 2019, and DT
terminated Rodriguez on October 19, 2019. (Compl. ¶¶ 10-11.)
PROCEDURAL
HISTORY
On March 10, 2020, Rodriguez filed the
Complaint asserting five causes of action:
1.
Wrongful
Discharge in Violation of FEHA;
2.
Wrongful
Discharge in Violation of Public Policy;
3.
Failure to
Engage in a Timely Good Faith Interactive Process;
4.
Failure to
Produce a Complete Personnel File; and
5.
Failure to
Produce all Itemized Wage Statements.
On May 11, 2020, DT filed a Motion to Compel
Arbitration. That Motion was granted.
On February 7, 2022, Rodriguez filed an Ex
Parte Application to Lift Arbitration Stay and for an Order Scheduling a Jury Trial.
On February 9, 2022, the Court granted
Rodriguez’s Ex Parte Application.
On August 9, 2022, Rodriguez filed the
operative First Amended Complaint, adding four causes of action for Violation
of the Comprehensive Computer Data Access and Fraud Act, Violation of the
Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, Violation of the Electronic Communications
Privacy Act of 1986, and Invasion of Privacy.
On September 12, 2022, DT filed an Answer.
On October 14, 2022, Defendant Isaac Archer
(“Archer”) filed an Answer.
On December 5, 2022, Attorneys Michael Dawe
(“Dawe”) and Michael D. Cronin (“Cronin”) filed the instant Motion to be
Relieved as Counsel as to Defendants Archer and DT.
No Opposition has been filed.
DISCUSSION
Attorneys
Michael Dawe and Michael D. Cronin move to be relieved as counsel for
Defendants Direct Therapy S&P Corporation and Isaac Archer.
California Rule of Court rule 3.1362 (Motion to Be Relieved
as Counsel) requires (1) notice of motion and motion to be directed to the client
(made on the Notice of Motion and Motion to be Relieved as Counsel—Civil form
(MC-051)); (2) a declaration stating in general terms and without compromising
the confidentiality of the attorney-client relationship why a motion under Code
of Civil Procedure section 284(2) is brought instead of filing a consent under
Code of Civil Procedure section 284(1) (made on the Declaration in Support of
Attorney’s Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel—Civil form (MC-052)); (3) service
of the notice of motion and motion and declaration on all other parties who
have appeared in the case; and (4) the proposed order relieving counsel
(prepared on the Order Granting Attorney’s Motion to Be Relieved as
Counsel—Civil form (MC-053)).
The
court has discretion to allow an attorney to withdraw, and such a motion should
be granted provided that there is no prejudice to the client and it does not
disrupt the orderly process of justice. (Ramirez v. Sturdevant
(1994) 21 Cal.App.4th 904, 915.)
Here, Dawe and Cronin have satisfied the requirements of
rule 3.1362. In his declaration, Cronin states that DT and Archer have failed
to pay fees in breach of the retainer agreement, and that a breakdown in the
attorney-client relationship has made continued representation unreasonably
difficult.
The Court finds that good cause exists to relieve Dawe and
Cronin from representation of Defendants Direct Therapy S&P Corporation and
Isaac Archer. And, as no Opposition has been filed and as trial has been set
for August, 2023, Dawe and Cronin’s relief will not cause prejudice to any
party.
Accordingly, Attorneys Michael Dawe and Brian D. Cronin’s
Motion to be Relieved as Counsel for Defendants Direct Therapy S&P
Corporation and Isaac Archer is GRANTED.
As Defendant Direct Therapy S&P Corporation is a
corporate entity, it must retain legal counsel. (See Caressa Camille, Inc.
v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Bd. (2002) 99 Cal.App.4th
1094, 1101.) Accordingly, an OSC re: Direct Therapy S&P Corporation’s
Representation will be scheduled for March 23, 2023, the date of the next
hearing in this matter.
DATED:
February 15, 2023
____________________________
Hon. Robert S. Draper
Judge of the Superior Court