Judge: Ronald F. Frank, Case: 23TRCV02990, Date: 2024-03-06 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 23TRCV02990 Hearing Date: March 6, 2024 Dept: 8
Tentative Ruling¿¿
¿¿¿
HEARING DATE: March 6, 2024
¿¿¿
CASE NUMBER: 23TRCV02990
¿¿¿
CASE NAME: Mohameduvesh Patel
v. Stephanie Hernandez Hijar, et al.
¿¿¿ ¿¿¿
ATTORNEY NAME: Plaintiff, Mohameduvesh Patel’s,
attorney, Astghik Ghevondyan, Esq.
TRIAL DATE: Not
Set.
¿¿¿
MOTION:¿ (1) Motion to be Relieved as Counsel
¿
Tentative Rulings: (1) Motion to be Relieved as Counsel is GRANTED. But the
Court needs last contact information for the Plaintiff
I.
Background
On
September 11, 2023, Plaintiff, Mohameduvesh Patel (“Plaintiff”) filed a
Complaint against Defendants, Stephanie Hernandez Hijar, Irma Hijar Martinez,
and DOES 1 through 50. The Complaint alleges causes of action for: (1) Motor
Vehicle Negligence; and (2) General Negligence.
On
February 5, 2024, Plaintiff, Mohameduvesh Patel’s counsel of record, Astghik Ghevondyan, Esq.
(“Ghevondyan”)
filed a Motion to be Relieved as Counsel.
II.
Legal Standard & Discussion
Code of Civil Procedure § 284 states that
“the attorney in an action…may be changed at any time before or after judgment
or final determination, as follows: (1) upon the consent of both client and
attorney…; (2) upon the order of the court, upon the application of either
client or attorney, after notice from one to the other.” (Code Civ. Proc.
§ 284; CRC 3.1362.) The withdrawal request may be denied if it would
cause an injustice or undue delay in proceeding; but the court's discretion in
this area is one to be exercised reasonably. (See Mandell v. Superior
(1977) 67 Cal.App.3d 1, 4; Lempert¿v. Superior Court (2003) 112 Cal.App.4th 1161, 1173.)
In making a motion to be relieved as
counsel, the attorney must comply with procedures set forth in Cal. Rules of
Court 3.1362. The motion must be made using mandatory forms: Notice of
Motion and Motion to be Relieved as Counsel directed to the client – Civil
(MC-051); Declaration “stating in general terms and without compromising the
confidentiality of the attorney-client relationship” reasons the motion was
brought (MC-052); and a Proposed Order (MC-053). (Ibid.) The
forms must be filed and served on all parties who have appeared in the
case. (Ibid.)
Here, Plaintiff’s counsel,
Ghevondyan, moves the Court to relieve her as attorney of record for Plaintiff.
Ghevondyan properly filed a Notice of Motion, Motion to be Relieved as Counsel,
Declaration, and Proposed Order in accordance with Cal. Rules of Court 3.1362. Per the moving papers, on February 5, 2024,
all forms for the pending motion were served on Plaintiff by mail. Ghevondyan notes
that Plaintiff’s last known address has been confirmed by telephone. Further, on
February 5, 2024, proof of service for said documents were filed with the
Court.
In the declaration Ghevondyan
notes that she is making this motion based upon the grounds that her contact
with the client has been lost.
Since Plaintiff’s attorney
has complied with all procedural requirements in filing a motion to be relieved
as counsel and because the withdrawal would not cause an injustice or undue
delay in proceedings, the Court finds that withdrawal of Astghik Ghevondyan
as attorney of record for Plaintiff, Mohameduvesh Patel can be accomplished
without undue prejudice to their interests. But the Court needs last contact
information for the Plaintiff herself so defense counsel and the Court can
communicate with Plaintiff going forward.
III.
Conclusion & Order
For the foregoing reasons, Astghik Ghevondyan’s, Motion to Be Relieved As Counsel is
GRANTED and the Order will be signed at the hearing. “After the order is
signed, a copy of the signed order must be served on the client and on all
parties that have appeared in the case.” (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1362(e).)
The Order on this Motion will not be effective “until proof of service of a
copy of the signed order on Plaintiff and Defendant has been filed with the
court.” (Id.)
Moving party is ordered to
give notice.