Judge: Salvatore Sirna, Case: 24PSCV02374, Date: 2025-02-06 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 24PSCV02374 Hearing Date: February 6, 2025 Dept: G
Defendant El Monte Union High School District’s Demurrer
to Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint
Respondent: Plaintiffs Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 2, Jane Doe 3,
Jane Doe 4, Jane Doe 5, Jane Doe 6, Jane Doe 7, Jane Doe 8, and Jane Doe 9
Defendant El Monte Union High School District’s Motion
to Strike Portions of Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint
Respondent: Plaintiffs Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 2, Jane Doe 3,
Jane Doe 4, Jane Doe 5, Jane Doe 6, Jane Doe 7, Jane Doe 8, and Jane Doe 9
TENTATIVE
RULING
Defendant El Monte Union High School District’s Demurrer
to Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint and Motion to Strike Portions of
Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint are CONTINUED to a date to be determined at
the hearing in Department G (Pomona).
Defendant El Monte Union High School District’s Counsel
is also ordered to meet and confer with Plaintiffs Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 2, Jane
Doe 3, Jane Doe 4, Jane Doe 5, Jane Doe 6, Jane Doe 7, Jane Doe 8, and Jane Doe
9’s Counsel regarding the Demurrer and Motion to Strike and to file a
supplemental declaration describing such meet and confer efforts, including
whether the attempts were made by telephone, video conference, or in person,
at least nine (9) court days before the next scheduled hearing on the Demurrer
and Motion to Strike.
BACKGROUND
This is an action for child sexual abuse. On July 23, 2024,
Plaintiffs Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 2, Jane Doe 3, Jane Doe 4, Jane Doe 5, Jane Doe
6, Jane Doe 7, Jane Doe 8, and Jane Doe 9 filed a complaint against Defendant
El Monte Union High School District (EMUHSD) and Does 1-100, alleging a cause
of action for negligence.
On November 14, 2024, Plaintiffs filed a First Amended
Complaint (FAC) against the same defendants alleging the same cause of action.
On January 2, 2025, EMUHSD filed the present demurrer and
motion to strike. A hearing on the present motions is set for February 6, 2025,
along with a CMC on February 11, 2025.
ANALYSIS
EMUHSD demurs to Plaintiffs’ FAC on the
grounds that it is time-barred and improperly joins claims. For the following reasons, the court finds parties did not
adequately meet and confer.
Legal Standard
Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 430.41,
subdivision (a), prior to filing a demurrer, “the demurring party shall meet
and confer in person or by telephone with the party who filed the pleading that
is subject to demurrer for the purpose of determining whether an agreement can
be reached that would resolve the objections to be raised in the demurrer.”
This section further provides that “the demurring party shall identify all of
the specific causes of action that it believes are subject to demurrer and
identify with legal support the basis of the deficiencies.” (Code Civ. Proc., §
430.41, subd. (a)(1).)
While Code of Civil Procedure section 430.41, subdivision
(a)(4) makes clear failing to meet and confer is not grounds to overrule a
demurrer, courts “are not required to ignore defects in the meet and confer
process” and if the court determines “no meet and confer has taken place, or
concludes further conferences between counsel would likely be productive, it
retains discretion to order counsel to meaningfully discuss the pleadings with
an eye toward reducing the number of issues or eliminating the need for a
demurrer, and to continue the hearing date to facilitate that effort.” (Dumas
v. Los Angeles County Bd. of Supervisors (2020) 45 Cal.App.5th 348, 355
& fn. 3.)
Discussion
In
this case, EMUHSD’s counsel filed a declaration stating counsel met and
conferred through an exchange of emails with Plaintiffs’ counsel. (Gibbs Decl.,
¶ 6-7.) Because email correspondence is not a code-compliant means of meeting
and conferring, a continuance of the hearing on the demurrer and motion to
strike is appropriate.
CONCLUSION
Based on the foregoing, EMUHSD’s demurrer and motion to strike are CONTINUED to a date
to be determined at the hearing in Department G (Pomona).
EMUHSD’s counsel is
also ordered to meet and confer with Plaintiffs’ counsel regarding the demurrer
and motion to strike and to file a supplemental declaration describing such
meet and confer efforts, including whether the attempts were made by
telephone, video conference, or in person, at least nine (9) court days
before the next scheduled hearing on the demurrer and motion to strike.