Judge: Serena R. Murillo, Case: 20STCV27132, Date: 2022-12-20 Tentative Ruling

Case Number: 20STCV27132     Hearing Date: December 20, 2022    Dept: 29

TENTATIVE

 

Plaintiff Felicia Williams’s Motion for Appointment of Successor in Interest is DENIED.

 

Legal Standard

 

CCP section 377.31 provides that “[o]n motion after the death of a person who commenced an action or proceeding, the court shall allow a pending action or proceeding that does not abate to be continued by the decedent’s personal representative or, if none, by the decedent’s successor in interest.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 377.31.)

 

CCP section 377.32 provides that a person who seeks to commence such an action as the decedent’s successor in interest must file an affidavit or declaration providing the following:

 

1.      The decedent’s name.

 

2.      The date and place of the decedent’s death.

 

3.      “No proceeding is now pending in California for administration of the decedent’s estate.”

 

4.      If the decedent’s estate was administered, a copy of the final order showing the distribution of the decedent’s cause of action to the successor in interest.

 

5.      Either of the following, as appropriate, with facts in support thereof:

 

A.      “The affiant or declarant is the decedent’s successor in interest (as defined in Section 377.11 of the California Code of Civil Procedure) and succeeds to the decedent’s interest in the action or proceeding.”

B.      “The affiant or declarant is authorized to act on behalf of the decedent’s successor in interest (as defined in Section 377.11 of the California Code of Civil Procedure) with respect to the decedent’s interest in the action or proceeding.”

 

6.      “No other person has a superior right to commence the action or proceeding or to be substituted for the decedent in the pending action or proceeding.”

 

7.      “The affiant or declarant affirms or declares under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct.”

 

(Code Civ. Proc., § 377.32(a).) A certified copy of the decedent’s death certificate must also be attached to the affidavit or declaration. (Id., § 377.32(c).)

 

“‘Decedent’s successor in interest’ means the beneficiary of the decedent’s estate or other successor in interest who succeeds to a cause of action or to a particular item of the property that is the subject of a cause of action.” (Code. Civ. Proc., § 377.11.) A “beneficiary of the decedent’s estate” means “if the decedent died without a will, the sole person or all of the persons who succeed to a cause of action, or to a particular item of property that is the subject of a cause of action, under Sections 6401 and 6402 of the Probate Code or, if the law of a sister state or foreign nation governs succession to the cause of action or particular item of property, under the law of the sister state or foreign nation.” (Code of Civ. Proc., § 377.10.)

 

In turn, Probate Code section 6402 provides, in pertinent part that “the part of the intestate estate not passing to the surviving spouse, under Section 6401, or the entire intestate estate if there is no surviving spouse, passes as follows: ¶ (a) To the issue of the decedent ….”

 

Discussion

 

Since the time of the filing of Plaintiff’s Complaint, Plaintiff has died. In light of her death, Lisa Monquie Williams moves for an order permitting her substitution as the Successor in Interest to Plaintiff’s causes of action.

 

On October 10 and November 14, 2022, the Court continued this matter to allow Plaintiff to provide a clarification as to whether Lisa is Plaintiff’s mother or daughter, to file a new declaration providing the place of Decedent’s death, and to file a certified copy of Plaintiff’s death certificate. At the hearing on November 14, 2022, the Court warned Plaintiff that it was continuing the hearing for the last time. However, as of December 16, 2022, Plaintiff has yet to submit the missing information.

 

Accordingly, the Court denies Plaintiff’s motion to appoint Lisa Monquie Williams as her successor in interest.

 

Conclusion

 

Plaintiff Felicia Williams’s Motion for Appointment of Successor in Interest is DENIED.

 

Moving party is ordered to give notice.