Judge: Serena R. Murillo, Case: 20STCV34824, Date: 2022-09-08 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 20STCV34824 Hearing Date: September 8, 2022 Dept: 29
Gladys
Paredes v. John
Haigh
TENTATIVE
The Motion to Reclassify as Limited Civil Jurisdiction Case is DENIED.
Legal Standard
“If a party
files a motion for reclassification after the time for that party to amend that
party’s initial pleading or to respond to a complaint, the court shall grant
the motion and enter an order for reclassification only if both of the
following conditions are satisfied:
(1) the
case is incorrectly classified.
(2) the moving party shows good cause for not seeking reclassification
earlier.” Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 403.040(b).
The court can transfer an action to limited jurisdiction if “it becomes clear that the
matter will ‘necessarily’ result in a verdict below the superior court
jurisdictional amount.” Walker v. Superior Court (1992) 53 Cal. 3d 257,
262.
The standard requires a
“high level of certainty” that a damage award will not exceed jurisdictional
limits.
“The court
explained: ‘This standard requires¿a high level of certainty¿that
a damage award will not exceed $25,000 and is not satisfied by a finding that
such an award is merely 'unlikely' or 'not reasonably probable.' " (Id.
at p. 269, italics added.) Consequently, in deciding this issue, the trial
court is¿not permitted to determine the merits of the plaintiff's claim(s); its
sole inquiry is whether ‘the verdict will 'necessarily' fall short of the
superior court jurisdictional requirement of a claim exceeding $25,000." Singer v.
Superior Court (1999) 70 Cal. App. 4th 1315, 1320.
Discussion
Defendant moves to reclassify the action as a
limited jurisdiction action arguing that Plaintiff has only incurred $7,680 in
medical bills. Further, Defendant argues that Plaintiff has indicated she does
not require any additional treatment for her injuries. Additionally, Plaintiff is not making a
claim for loss of earnings or loss of future earning capacity. Moreover, Defendant
argues that both parties have valued this case at less than $25,000. Plaintiff
served a 998 Offer to Compromise for $12,500. In response, Defendant served a
998 Offer to Compromise for $10,000. Thus,
Defendant argues her damages will not exceed $25,000.
Based on the evidence, it
does not appear to a “legal certainty” that Plaintiff cannot recover more than
the jurisdictional amount. The amount of medical
expenses incurred by Plaintiff to date is not dispositive. Plaintiff’s
complaint also alleges general damages and property damage.
Conclusion
As such, Defendant’s
motion to reclassify from unlimited civil jurisdiction to limited civil
jurisdiction court is DENIED.
Moving party is ordered to give notice.