Judge: Serena R. Murillo, Case: 20STCV37385, Date: 2022-12-08 Tentative Ruling

Case Number: 20STCV37385    Hearing Date: December 8, 2022    Dept: 29

TENTATIVE

Plaintiff’s motion to compel responses to special interrogatories is GRANTED.

Plaintiff’s motion to compel production of documents is GRANTED.

Monetary sanctions are awarded in the amount of $1,375.


Legal Standard

 

Compel Responses to Interrogatories and the Production of Documents

 

If a party to whom interrogatories are directed fails to serve a timely response, the propounding party may move for an order to compel responses.  (Code Civ. Proc. § 2030.290(b).)  The statute contains no time limit for a motion to compel where no responses have been served.  All that need be shown in the moving papers is that a set of interrogatories was properly served on the opposing party, that the time to respond has expired, and that no response of any kind has been served.  (Leach, supra, at 905-06.)

 

For the production of documents, the propounding party may file a motion to compel responses without objection if a responding party fails to serve timely responses.  (Code Civ. Proc. § 2031.300(a)-(b).)

 

Monetary Sanctions

 

Under Code of Civil Procedure section 2023.010(d), misuse of the discovery process includes “[f]ailing to respond or to submit to an authorized method of discovery.”  The court may order sanctions to cover “the reasonable expenses, including attorney’s fees, incurred by anyone as a result of” the misuse of the discovery by the party being sanctioned.  (Code Civ. Proc. § 2023.030(a).)

 

But “sections 2023.010 and 2023.030 do not independently authorize the trial court to impose monetary sanctions for misuse of discovery.  (City of Los Angeles v. PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLC (2022) 84 Cal.App.5th 466, ___ [300 Cal.Rptr.3d 432], this newly-newly published case does not yet have page numbers in the official reporter.)  The award of monetary sanction must be based on another provision of the Discovery Act, Code of Civil Procedure section 2016.010 et seq.

 

Where the court grants a motion to compel responses to interrogatories, sanctions shall be imposed against the party who unsuccessfully makes or opposes a motion to compel, unless the party acted with substantial justification or the sanction would otherwise be unjust.  (Code Civ. Proc. § 2030.290(c).)  There is a parallel provision for the court to impose monetary sanctions against any party, person or attorney who unsuccessfully opposes a motion to compel response to written discovery.  (Code Civ. Proc. § 2031.300(c).)

 

Discussion

 

Compel Deposition and Produce Documents

 

 

Plaintiff served Defendant with the special interrogatories and demand for production of documents on December 2, 2021.  (Knafo Decl. ¶ 3.)  Responses were originally due on January 3, 2022, but Plaintiff granted Defendant’s requested extension to January 18, 2022.  (Knafo Decl. ¶ 4.)  Defendant failed to respond to the interrogatories or demand for documents on January 18, 2022.  (Knafo Decl. ¶ 4.)

 

Plaintiff emailed Defendant seven times from February to April regarding the past-due responses.  (Knafo Decl. ¶ 4; Motion, Exh. 2.)  At one point, Plaintiff represented to Defendant responses had been sent “some time ago” and would be resent.  (Motion, Exh. 2, pp. 3, 5.)

 

Plaintiff also called Defendant twice in April to inquire about the responses.  (Knafo Decl. ¶ 5.)  Defendant did not respond to the interrogatories or demand for production of documents or return Plaintiff’s calls.  (Knafo Decl. ¶¶ 5-6.)

 

Therefore, without evidence Defendant served responses to Plaintiff’s interrogatories or demand for production of documents, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s motions to compel responses to interrogatories and the production of documents.

 

Monetary Sanctions

 

As stated above, each of the motions Plaintiff filed on May 25, 2022, included a request for monetary sanctions.  Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure sections 2030.290(c) and 2031.300(c), the Court finds an award of $1,375 appropriate, based on a total of 2.5 hours of work for these two motions at a rate of $550/hour.

 

Conclusion

 

Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion to compel responses to special interrogatories is GRANTED.

 

Plaintiff’s motion to compel production of documents is GRANTED.

 

Monetary sanctions are awarded in the amount of $1,375.

 

Moving party is ordered to give notice.