Judge: Serena R. Murillo, Case: 21STCV35466, Date: 2023-03-03 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 21STCV35466 Hearing Date: March 3, 2023 Dept: 29
TENTATIVE
Defendants’ motion to continue
trial is CONTINUED.
Legal
Standard
California Rules of Court, rule
3.1332, subdivision (c) states that
although disfavored, the trial date may be continued for “good cause,” which
includes (without limitation): (1) unavailability of trial counsel or witnesses
due to “death, illness, or other excusable circumstances”; (2) the addition of
a new party depriving the new party (or other parties) from conducting
discovery and preparing for trial; (3) “excused inability to obtain essential
testimony, documents, or other material evidence despite diligent efforts”; or
(4) “[a] significant, unanticipated change in the status of the case”
preventing it from being ready for trial. (Id., Rule
3.1332(c).)
Other relevant
considerations may include: “(1) The proximity of the trial date; [¶]
(2) Whether there was any previous continuance, extension of time, or delay of
trial due to any party; [¶] (3) The length of the continuance requested; [¶]
(4) The availability of alternative means to address the problem that gave rise
to the motion or application for a continuance; [¶] (5) The prejudice that
parties or witnesses will suffer as a result of the continuance; [¶] (6) If the
case is entitled to a preferential trial setting, the reasons for that status
and whether the need for a continuance outweighs the need to avoid delay; [¶] (7)
The court's calendar and the impact of granting a continuance on other pending
trials; [¶] (8) Whether trial counsel is engaged in another trial; [¶] (9)
Whether all parties have stipulated to a continuance; [¶] (10) Whether the
interests of justice are best served by a continuance, by the trial of the
matter, or by imposing conditions on the continuance; and [¶] (11) Any other
fact or circumstance relevant to the fair determination of the motion or
application.” (Id., Rule 3.1332(d).)
Code of Civil Procedure
section 2024.050 allows a court to grant leave to complete discovery
proceedings. In doing so, a court shall consider matters relevant to the
leave requested, including, but not limited to: (1) the necessity of the
discovery, (2) the diligence in seeking the discovery or discovery motion, (3)
the likelihood of interference with the trial calendar or prejudice to a party,
and (4) the length of time that has elapsed between previous trial dates.
(Code Civ. Proc. § 2024.050.)
Discussion
Code of Civil
Procedure Section 1005(b) provides that “[u]nless otherwise ordered or
specifically provided law, all moving and supporting papers shall be served and
filed at least 16 court days before the hearing.” “[I]f the notice is
served by facsimile transmission, express mail, or another method of delivery
providing for overnight delivery, the required 16-day period of notice shall be
increased by two calendar days.” (Code Civ. Proc. § 1005(b).)
On February 10, 2022, Defendant served by facsimile machine the
instant Motion. To comply with the statutory requirements for notice,
including the two calendar days for facsimile transmission, the earliest date
the Court could hear this Motion would be March 10, 2023. As such,
Defendants did not comply with the requisite notice period.
Thus, Defendants’ Motion is CONTINUED.
Conclusion
Accordingly, the
motion to continue trial and all related deadlines is CONTINUED to March 14, 2023 at 1:30 pm.
Moving party is ordered to give notice.