Judge: Shirley K. Watkins, Case: 22VECV01276, Date: 2022-12-06 Tentative Ruling
If ALL parties submit on the tentative, then no appearance is necessary unless some other matter (i.e., Case Management Conference) is on calendar. It is not necessary to call the court to request oral argument. Oral argument is permitted on all tentative rulings.
Case Number: 22VECV01276 Hearing Date: December 6, 2022 Dept: T
|
FINANCIAL SERVICES VEHICLE TRUST etc., Plaintiff, vs. EMMA MURADYAN,
et al. Defendants. |
|
[TENTATIVE]
ORDER RE: APPLICATION
FOR WRIT OF POSSESSION Dept. T 8:30 a.m. December 6, 2022 |
|
|
|
|
[TENTATIVE] ORDER:
Plaintiff Financial Services Vehicle Trust’s Application for Writ of
Possession is GRANTED. The Court waives an
undertaking from Plaintiff Financial Services Vehicle Trust. For redelivery of the vehicle or to stay
delivery, Defendant Emma Muradyan is ordered to post an undertaking in the
amount of $30,000.00.
Plaintiff Financial Services Vehicle Trust by and through
its servicer BMW Financial Services NA, LLC (Plaintiff) moved for a writ of
possession against Defendant Emma Muradyan (Defendant.)
Discussion
Plaintiff’s proof of service showed
that Defendant was properly served with the summons and complaint and properly
notified of the hearing on the application. (Code Civ. Proc. sec. 512.010.)
Plaintiff provided a declaration from
BMW Financial Services NA, LLC (BMW FS) to show the probable validity of their
claim and right to repossess the vehicle from Defendant because Plaintiff
provided evidence showing Defendant’s entry into the lease agreement for the
vehicle, Plaintiff assignor’s performance of delivery of the vehicle, Defendant’s
breach in failing to pay, and Plaintiff’s damages. (Code Civ. Proc sec. 512.040.) Plaintiff further provided that the vehicle
is in the custody and control of Defendant and located at Defendant’s premise
or Defendant’s employment address. (Code
Civ. Proc. sec. 512.060.) With Defendant’s
breach, Defendant no longer has rights to possess and further refused to
surrender the vehicle. Plaintiff has
shown their rights to possession.
Plaintiff submitted the value of the
vehicle. The evidence shows that the
account balance exceeds the value of the vehicle and no equity exits for the
Defendant. The Court finds that the
requirement to post an undertaking is waived.
(Code Civ. Proc. sec. 515.010.)
Plaintiff requested a re-delivery
bond of $30,000.00 be imposed upon Defendant.
(Code Civ. Proc. sec. 515.020.) Plaintiff
submitted that their undertaking would have been the account balance plus an
attorney fees and costs. The Court finds
that the request for a re-delivery bond to be proper.
IT IS SO ORDERED,
____________________ TO GIVE NOTICE.
December 6, 2022
_____________________
Shirley K. Watkins
Judge of the
Superior Court