Judge: Shirley K. Watkins, Case: 22VECV01276, Date: 2023-01-25 Tentative Ruling
If ALL parties submit on the tentative, then no appearance is necessary unless some other matter (i.e., Case Management Conference) is on calendar. It is not necessary to call the court to request oral argument. Oral argument is permitted on all tentative rulings.
Case Number: 22VECV01276 Hearing Date: January 25, 2023 Dept: T
|
ALLY BANK, Plaintiff, vs. HERZEL GLASHEN
et al. Defendants. |
|
[TENTATIVE]
ORDER RE: APPLICATION
FOR WRIT OF POSSESSION Dept. T 8:30 a.m. January 25, 2023 |
|
|
|
|
Introduction
Plaintiff Ally Bank
(Plaintiff) moved for a writ of possession against Defendant Herzel Glashen
(Defendant.)
Discussion
Plaintiff’s
proof of service showed that Defendant was properly served with the summons and
complaint and properly notified of the hearing on the application. (Code Civ. Proc. sec. 512.010.)
Plaintiff provided a declaration to
show the probable validity of their claim and right to repossess the vehicle
from Defendant because Plaintiff provided evidence showing: Defendant’s entry
into the Retail Installment Sales Contract (RISC) for the vehicle; Plaintiff
assignor’s performance of delivery of the vehicle; Defendant’s breach in
failing to pay; and Plaintiff’s damages.
(Code Civ. Proc sec. 512.040.)
Plaintiff further provided that the vehicle is in the custody and
control of Defendant and located at one of two addresses. (Code Civ. Proc. sec. 512.060.) With Defendant’s breach, Defendant no longer
has rights to possess and further refused to surrender the vehicle. Plaintiff has shown their rights to
possession.
Plaintiff submitted the value of the
vehicle. The evidence showed that the
account balance exceeds the value of the vehicle and no equity exits for the
Defendant. The Court finds that the
requirement to post an undertaking is waived.
(Code Civ. Proc. sec. 515.010.)
Plaintiff’s
application for writ of possession is GRANTED.
Notice by Moving Party.