Judge: Shirley K. Watkins, Case: 22VECV01641, Date: 2023-03-13 Tentative Ruling
If ALL parties submit on the tentative, then no appearance is necessary unless some other matter (i.e., Case Management Conference) is on calendar. It is not necessary to call the court to request oral argument. Oral argument is permitted on all tentative rulings.
Case Number: 22VECV01641 Hearing Date: March 13, 2023 Dept: T
|
ISABEL CAMPOS, Plaintiff, vs. CONSTELLATION BRANDS, INC., et al., Defendants. |
|
[TENTATIVE]
ORDER RE: DEMURRER
TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT Dept. T 8:30 a.m. March 13, 2023 |
|
|
|
|
[TENTATIVE] ORDER: Defendant Constellation Brands, Inc.’s Demurrer
to the First Amended Complaint is SUSTAINED WITH 20 DAYS LEAVE TO AMEND.
The original complaint
was filed on 10/18/2022. She has attached,
re-signed, and filed additional copies of the complaint and her medical records
to various pleadings since then. The Defendant contends that Plaintiff is
continually changing the date of her injury; the court does not read her papers
that way. Each time Plaintiff files or
attaches a version of the complaint, it is always the same: the dates on each
page throughout the complaint are all the same dates; those dates are the date of signing, e.g., in the 10/18/2022 version, every date is 10/18/2022; in the
2/7/2023 version, the dates are all 2/7/2023; in the 2/6/2023 version, the same;
in the 1/3/2023 version, the same; in the 12/26/2022 version, the same, etc.
Defendant
argued that Plaintiff’s product liability Cause of action’s three counts are
uncertain and failed to allege sufficient facts to support a Cause of action. Looking at the First Amended Complaint on the
Judicial Council form complaint and attachments as a whole, the court can discern
that Plaintiff is claiming that by drinking Corona Beer, she developed problems
with her gallbladder, that the Defendant knew the Corona Beer would be
purchased and used without inspection for defects, that it was defective when
it left the control of the Defendant, that the beer was being used in the
manner that was reasonably foreseeable by Defendant as involving a substantial
danger (of causing gallbladder damage) not readily apparent, that adequate
warnings were not given, that Plaintiff was the purchaser and Defendant was the
manufacturer of the beer, that Defendant is strictly liable, that Defendant was
negligent, and that Defendant breached an implied warranty. Judicial Council
form PLD-PI-001(5) does not require more.
In
her Opposition, filed on 2/7/2023, Plaintiff attached her medical records from
Valley Presbyterian Hospital’s Emergency Department which showed health care
services being rendered on June 28, 2017. Half of the opposition is written in
Spanish without translation. Plaintiff also filed a “Request for Amendment of Health
Information” dated November 21, 2018 wherein Plaintiff added that she “was seen
at Valley Presbyterian Hospital" due to consumption of an alcoholic
beverage “Corona”. [sic] that it be stated that this was the cause of my
medical issue in which I had surgical removal of my gallbladder.” It is unclear
whether this event in June 2017 is what her current complaint is about or some
other event since then.
Again,
without specific information as to when the injuries in this case occurred, the
court cannot say on its face that the statute of limitations has expired.
For this reason, the court allows Plaintiff
to file a Second Amended Complaint to specifically set forth the date of her
injury that is the subject of her 12/27/2022 First Amended Complaint.
Alternatively, Plaintiff can file within
20 days an Amendment to the First Amended Complaint stating that the date of
her injury is _______________.
The Demurrer to the First Amended
Complaint is SUSTAINED WITH 20 DAYS LEAVE TO AMEND.