Judge Stephanie M. Bowick, Case 21STCV28476 2023-05-17 Tentative Ruling

Judge: Stephanie M. Bowick, Case: 21STCV28476, Date: 2023-05-17 Tentative Ruling

DEPARTMENT 19 LAW AND MOTION RULINGS
If you desire to submit on a tentative ruling, you may do so by e-mailing Dept. 19 before 08:00 a.m. on the day of the motion hearing. The e-mail address for submitting is SMCDept19@lacourt.org. The heading on your e-mail must contain the case name and number, and that you submit. For example, "Smith v. Jones BC551124, submit". The message should indicate your name, contact information, and the party you represent.

PLEASE NOTE, The above e-mail address is only to inform the Court of your submission on the tentative ruling. All other inquiries or correspondence will not receive a response.

Case Number: 21STCV28476 Hearing Date: May 17, 2023 Dept: 19

RULING

After consideration of the briefing filed, the unopposed Motion for an Order Appointing Socorro Garcia as Successor-in-Interest of Plaintiff Jose Garcia is GRANTED.

The Court signs the proposed order filed on August 11, 2022, as modified to reflect the correct date.

Counsel for Plaintiff to give notice.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

This is a lemon law action. Plaintiff Jose Garcia (“Plaintiff”) brings suit against Defendant FCA US LLC (“Defendant”) alleging the following causes of action:

1. Violation of Song-Beverly Act – Breach of Express Warranty;

2. Violation of Song-Beverly Act – Breach of Implied Warranty.

Plaintiff filed the instant Motion for an Order Appointing Socorro Garcia as Successor-in-Interest of Plaintiff Jose Garcia (the “Motion”).

GROUNDS FOR MOTION

Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 377.31, Plaintiff moves for an order appointing Socorro Garcia as Plaintiff’s successor-in-interest.

DISCUSSION

“Except as otherwise provided by statute, a cause of action for or against a person is not lost by reason of the person’s death, but survives subject to the applicable limitations period.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 377.20(a).) “A cause of action that survives the death of the person entitled to commence an action or proceeding passes to the decedent’s successor in interest… and an action may be commenced by the decedent’s personal representative or, if none, by the decedent’s successor in interest.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 377.30.) Further, “[o]n motion after the death of a person who commenced an action or proceeding, the court shall allow a pending action or proceeding that does not abate to be continued by the decedent’s personal representative or, if none, by the decedent’s successor in interest.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 377.31.)

Code of Civil Procedure section 377.32 provides that:

(a) The person who seeks to commence an action or proceeding or to continue a pending action or proceeding as the decedent’s successor in interest under this article, shall execute and file an affidavit or a declaration under penalty of perjury under the laws of this state stating all of the following:

(1) The decedent’s name.

(2) The date and place of the decedent’s death.

(3) “No proceeding is now pending in California for administration of the decedent’s estate.”

(4) If the decedent’s estate was administered, a copy of the final order showing the distribution of the decedent’s cause of action to the successor in interest.

(5) Either of the following, as appropriate, with facts in support thereof:

(A) “The affiant or declarant is the decedent’s successor in interest (as defined in Section 377.11 of the California Code of Civil Procedure) and succeeds to the decedent’s interest in the action or proceeding.”

(B) “The affiant or declarant is authorized to act on behalf of the decedent’s successor in interest (as defined in Section 377.11 of the California Code of Civil Procedure) with respect to the decedent’s interest in the action or proceeding.”

(6) “No other person has a superior right to commence the action or proceeding or to be substituted for the decedent in the pending action or proceeding.”

(7) “The affiant or declarant affirms or declares under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct.”

(b) Where more than one person executes the affidavit or declaration under this section, the statements required by subdivision (a) shall be modified as appropriate to reflect that fact.

(Code Civ. Proc., § 377.32.)

The Court finds the declaration of Socorro Garcia contains all the necessary information set forth in California Rules of Court, rule 377.32.

Accordingly, the Court GRANTS the Motion.