Judge: Stephen I. Goorvitch, Case: 19STCV20880, Date: 2023-09-18 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 19STCV20880 Hearing Date: September 18, 2023 Dept: 39
Juan Carlos Chavez
v. Immaculate Roofing Company, Inc.
Case No.
19STCV20880
Order Re-Setting
Five Year Date
Defendant’s Ex
Parte Application to Continue Trial Date and all Related Dates
Plaintiff
Juan Carlos Chavez (“Plaintiff”) filed this employment action against
Immaculate Roofing Company, Inc. (“Defendant”) on June 14, 2019. Default was entered on September 3, 2019, and
a default judgment was entered on February 7, 2020. The Court (Murphy, J.) granted a motion to
set aside the default/default judgment on March 19, 2021. The time period of September 3, 2019, to
March 19, 2021—which is 563 days—shall be excluded from the five-year deadline,
per Code of Civil Procedure section 583.240.
Therefore, the deadline for this case to proceed to trial is December
29, 2025. Defendant’s counsel
stipulated to this deadline in open court.
Defendant’s
counsel noticed Plaintiff’s deposition for August 17, 2023. (Declaration of S. Marin Keleti, ¶ 3.) Plaintiff’s counsel then informed him that
she was not available and suggested that the deposition be rescheduled to a
date between August 28 through August 30, 2023.
(Id., ¶ 4 & Exh. #2.)
Defendant’s counsel called Plaintiff’s counsel to reschedule the
deposition but never received a response to multiple voicemail messages. (Id., ¶ 5.)
Plaintiff’s counsel claims this occurred after August 30, 2023. (Declaration of Christopher Afgani, ¶
7.) Defendant’s counsel disputes this
representation, stating: “When I began calling Ms. Ortiz and Mr. Afgani, I
never received any response to my telephone voice mail messages. Instead, Plaintiff’s counsel pushed ahead
with their own agenda. For example, on
August 11, 2023, Mr. Afgani sent me an e-mail regarding contemplated motions in
limine . . . .” (Declaration of S.
Martin Keleti, ¶ 5.) The Court need not
resolve this dispute. Because there is
good cause for a trial continuance, there is no prejudice in reopening the discovery
cut-off and permitting Defendants’ counsel to take Plaintiff’s deposition.
On September 7, 2023, Defendant’s
counsel contracted COVID-19. (Id., ¶
9.) Three days later, on September 10,
2023, Defendant’s counsel’s spouse contracted COVID-19 and suffered a heart
attack. (Ibid.) Defendants’ counsel has been caring for his spouse:
“Remotely coordinating with doctors, nurses, and hospital support staff, and
reporting on progress to family has taken up many of my waking hours, and my
preoccupation with my spouse’s condition has wreaked havoc on my ability to be
productive.” (Ibid.) It is clear that Defendant’s counsel will not
be available for trial on the current trial date through no fault of his
own. These circumstances constitute good
cause to grant Defendant’s ex parte application.
Based upon
the foregoing, the Court orders as follows:
1. Defendant’s ex parte application to
continue the trial date and all related dates is granted.
2. The Court discharges the Order to Show
Cause re: Sanctions.
3. The Court advances and vacates all
dates.
4. The Court re-sets the deadline for this
case to proceed to trial under Code of Civil Procedure section 583.310 is
December 29, 2025.
5. The Court sets the following dates,
which are the first available dates:
Final
Status Conference: May
10, 2024, at 9:00 a.m.
Trial: May 21, 2024, at 9:30
a.m.
The discovery and motions deadlines shall be based on the
former trial date (October 3, 2023) except for the following, which shall be
based on the new trial date: (1) Depositions of the parties, (2) Expert
designation deadlines, and (3) Expert discovery.
6. Defendant’s counsel shall provide
notice and file proof of such with the Court.