Judge: Stephen I. Goorvitch, Case: 20STCV12854, Date: 2023-05-22 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 20STCV12854 Hearing Date: May 22, 2023 Dept: 39
1536
Blue Jay Way, LLC, et al. v. Craig R. Williams Construction, Inc., et al.
Case
No. 20STCV12854
Order
to Show Cause re: Five-Year Date
Plaintiffs
filed this action on April 1, 2020. Pursuant
to Code of Civil Procedure section 583.310, an action shall be brought to trial
within five years. Under normal circumstances, the deadline for this case
to proceed to trial would be April 1, 2025.
However, for purposes of computing this time, the Court excludes all
time for which “[b]ringing the action to trial . . . was impossible,
impracticable, or futile.” (Code Civ. Proc. s 583.340(c).) The Court makes the following findings:
Beginning
on March 16, 2020, civil jury trials were suspended in the Los Angeles County
Superior Court due to COVID-19. Pursuant to the Presiding Judge’s order
of July 10, 2020, civil jury trials would resume on the first court day in
January 2021, which is January 4, 2021. Therefore, this time period—March
16, 2020, to January 4, 2021—which is 294 days, is excludable.
Although
the Court reopened for civil jury trials on January 4, 2021, the Presiding
Judge authorized the civil judges to determine whether it was feasible to
conduct jury trials in their respective courtrooms, in consideration of issues
such as the size of the courtroom, the number of participants, and the length
of the trial. It was impossible for
Department #39 to proceed with jury trials from January 4, 2021, to May 11,
2021, due to the requirements of social distancing, the number of attorneys and
parties involved in jury trials, and the minimum length of jury trials. Therefore, this time period—January 4, 2021,
to May 11, 2021—which is 127 days, is excludable.
Although
Department #39 reopened for jury trials on May 11, 2021, it could only conduct
jury trials in smaller cases, i.e., cases involving fewer parties and taking
less time than the instant case. It
remained impossible for Department #39 to conduct a jury trial in a case like the
instant one until April 4, 2022.
Effective that date, the Court relaxed certain protocols (e.g.,
mandatory masking) based upon the Los Angeles County Department of Public
Health’s updated guidance. The
Department of Public Health had determined that case and test positivity rates
and hospitalizations had declined sufficiently, following the post-Omicron
winter surge of COVID-19, based upon which Department #39 fully re-opened for
jury trials. Therefore, this time
period—May 11, 2021, to April 4, 2022—which is 328 days, is excludable.
Based
upon the foregoing, the Court issues an Order to Show Cause why 749 days should
not be excluded from the five-year period during which this case shall be
brought to trial. Accordingly, the new
deadline for this case to proceed to trial would be April 20, 2027. The Court shall hold a case management
conference and hearing on this Order to Show Cause on May 22, 2023, at 1:30
p.m. at the following location:
Stanley
Mosk Courthouse
111
North Hill Street
Department
#39 (Goorvitch, J.)
Los
Angeles, California 90012
The Court orders all parties to
appear at the hearing, but authorizes (and encourages) remote appearances.
The
Court provides notice that absent objection, it intends to exclude 749 days
from the time during which this case must proceed to trial and re-set the
five-year date as April 20, 2027. Any
party who objects must file a written objection detailing the factual and/or
legal reasons why the Court cannot do so.
All objections must be filed on or before May 17, 2023. The Court provides notice that any party who
does not file a written objection and appear at the hearing shall waive the
right to be heard on this issue and shall submit to the Court’s order.
The
Court understands that Judge Cunningham ordered that the case shall remain
assigned to Department #39 without prejudice.
The Court advances and vacates the hearing dates on all pending
demurrers and motions to strike set for hearing on May 22, 2023. Those hearings will be re-set once there is a
final determination whether the case shall remain in Department #39 or shall be
reassigned to the Spring Street Courthouse.
The
Court’s clerk shall serve this order upon Plaintiff’s counsel via regular mail
and email. Plaintiff’s counsel shall
serve this order forthwith via email or other electronic means and shall file a
proof of service on or before May 17, 2023.