Judge: Stephen I. Goorvitch, Case: 21STCV13651, Date: 2023-01-20 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 21STCV13651 Hearing Date: January 20, 2023 Dept: 39
Kim Wood v. Joel
Boulanger Landscape Construction, et al.
Case No.
21STCV13651
Motion for
Terminating Sanctions
The Court
posts this tentative on Wednesday, January 18, 2022, and provides notice that
if Defendant Joel Boulanger does not appear at the hearing, either remotely or
in-person, he shall waive the right to be heard on this motion and shall submit
to entry of this tentative order.
Plaintiffs
Kim Wood and Freeman Wood (“Plaintiffs”) previously moved to compel responses
from Defendant Joel Boulanger (“Defendant”) to Form Interrogatories, set two
(“FROG”). Plaintiffs also moved to deem
the matters specified in the Requests for Admission, Set Two (“RFAs”), to have
been admitted. The Court granted the
motion to compel and ordered Defendant to provide a code-compliant response,
without objections, within twenty (20) days.
(See Court’s Minute Order, dated November 21, 2022.) The Court also granted the motion to deem
admitted. (Ibid.) The Court also ordered Defendant to pay
monetary sanctions.
Plaintiffs
filed a motion for terminating sanctions based upon Defendant’s non-compliance
with his discovery obligations.
Defendant did not file any opposition to this motion, and the record
reflects no good cause for Defendant’s failure to comply with his discovery
obligations. The Court finds that
nothing less than terminating sanctions will suffice. Defendant has abused the discovery process
and has not been participating in this litigation. The Court previously ordered monetary
sanctions, to no avail, and all admissions have been deemed admitted. Therefore, good cause having been shown, and
the Court having considered whether lesser sanctions would be appropriate, the
Court rules as follows:
1. Plaintiffs’
motion for terminating sanctions is granted.
2. The Court strikes the answer of
Defendant Joel Boulanger.
3. The Court advances and vacates all
dates.
4. The Court orders Plaintiffs’ counsel to
submit a default judgment packet supported by sufficient admissible evidence
(e.g., declarations from his clients, etc.)
5. The Court sets an Order to Show Cause
why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution under Code of
Civil Procedure sections 581 and 583 for February 17, 2023, at 8:30 a.m.
6. Plaintiffs’ counsel shall provide
notice and file proof of such with the Court.