Judge: Stephen I. Goorvitch, Case: 21STCV27878, Date: 2023-01-19 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 21STCV27878 Hearing Date: January 19, 2023 Dept: 39
Gary Marenzi, et
al. v. Pacific Life Insurance Company, et al.
Case No. 21STCV27878
Motion to Compel
Further Responses
Plaintiffs
seek to compel further responses to Requests for Production of Documents, Sets
Two and Three (“Sets Two and Three”) from Defendant Pacific Life Insurance
Company (“Pacific Life.”) These requests
are duplicative of Requests for Production, Set One (“Set One”). Pacific Life served objections, and
Plaintiffs’ counsel concedes that he propounded Set Two and Set Three instead
of filing a motion to compel further responses with respect to Set One. As Plaintiffs did not move to compel further
responses to previous requests, Plaintiffs waived the right to compel documents
Plaintiffs previously requested. (See
Code Civ. Proc., § 2031.320, subd. (a), see New Albertsons, Inc. v. Superior
Court (2008) 168 Cal.App.4th 1403, 1427-1428.) Accordingly, the motion to compel further
responses is denied. This order is
without prejudice to Plaintiff’s ability to seek responsive documents at
deposition. (See Carter v. Superior
Court (1990) 218 Cal.App.3d 994, 997.)
Pacific
Life seeks discovery sanctions in the amount of $6,090 against Plaintiffs and
their counsel of record, Engstrom, Lipscomb & Lack, jointly and
severally. The Court finds that there
was no substantial justification for this motion, which constitutes an abuse of
the discovery process. Therefore, the
Court orders Plaintiffs and their counsel-of-record, jointly and severally, to
pay discovery sanctions in the amount of $4,350 based upon ten (10) hours of
attorney time at a reasonable billing rate of $435 per hour.
Based upon
the foregoing, the Court orders as follows:
1. Plaintiffs’
motion to compel further responses is denied.
2. Plaintiffs
and their counsel, Engstrom, Lipscomb & Lack, jointly and severally, shall
pay sanctions to Plaintiffs in the amount of $4,350 within thirty (30) days.
3. Defendants’
counsel shall provide notice and file proof of such with the Court.