Judge: Stephen I. Goorvitch, Case: 21STCV46597, Date: 2023-01-17 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 21STCV46597 Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 Dept: 39
Richard Adams v.
General Motors, LLC
Case No.
21STCV46597
Plaintiff’s Motion
to Compel Further Responses
Plaintiff’s
motion to compel further responses is granted in part and denied in part. Defendant shall produce the following
documents, to the extent Defendant has not done so already, within sixty (60)
days:
1. Purchase and/or lease contract
concerning the subject vehicle.
2. Repair orders and invoices concerning
the subject vehicle.
3. Communications
with dealer, factory representative and/or call center concerning the subject
vehicle.
4. Warranty
claims submitted to and/or approved by Defendant concerning the subject
vehicle.
5. Any Warranty
Policy and Procedure Manual published by defendant and provided to its
authorized repair facilities, within the State of California, for the date the
subject vehicle was purchased to the present.
6. Any internal
analysis, investigation, and/or communications regarding the same defects
claimed by plaintiff in vehicles of the same year, make and model as the subject
vehicle which were sold within the State of California.
7. Any customer
complaints regarding the same defects claimed by plaintiff in vehicles of the
same year, make and model as the subject vehicle which were sold within the
State of California.
8. All policies
and/or procedures used to evaluate customer requests for repurchase pursuant to
the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act, from the date of purchase to the
present.
9. Technical
Service Bulletins and/or Recall Notices regarding the same defects claimed by
plaintiff in vehicles of the same year, make and model of the subject vehicle
which were sold within the State of California.
10. Any documents
supporting plaintiff’s claim for incidental and/or consequential damages.
Plaintiff’s counsel shall provide notice and file proof of
such with the Court.