Judge: Stephen I. Goorvitch, Case: 22STCV02424, Date: 2024-01-10 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 22STCV02424 Hearing Date: January 10, 2024 Dept: 39
Jesus Diaz, et al.
v. RTED Irvine, LLP, et al.
Case No.
22STCV02424
Motion for
Attorneys’ Fees
            Plaintiffs
Jesus Diaz and Araceli Diaz (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) filed this action
against RTED Irvine LLC (“Defendant”), asserting causes of action for quiet
title, fraud, breach of contract, and negligence.  The Court granted summary judgment, and
Defendant now seeks attorneys’ fees under Civil Code section 1717 and Code of
Civil Procedure 1021.  Attorneys’ fees
are available “[i]n any action on a contract, where the contract specifically
provides that attorney’s fees and costs, which are incurred to enforce the
contract, shall be awarded . . . .” 
(Civ. Code, § 1717.)    
In this case, Defendant relies on
an attorneys’ fees provision in the deed of trust, which states: “[Plaintiffs]
agree[] to pay all costs and expenses incurred by [Defendant] in collecting,
enforcing or protecting [Defendant]’s rights under this Security
Instrument.  This Amount may include, but
is not limited to attorneys’ fees, court costs, and other legal expenses.”  (Declaration of Richard J. Reynolds, Exhibit
A, § 10.)  However, Plaintiffs’ action
“was not an action ‘on a contract’ containing an attorney’s fees provision . .
. .”  (See Hyduke's Valley Motors v.
Lobel Financial Corp. (2010) 189 Cal.App.4th 430, 436.)  Rather, Plaintiffs alleged that Defendant
promised to forgive a certain amount of the debt as part of a modification of
the loan and stay the foreclosure if Plaintiffs paid a certain amount of
money.  (See Complaint, ¶¶ 18-19.)  This is not a lawsuit to enforce the contract
at issue.  Nor was Defendant’s defense
related to collecting, enforcing, or protecting its rights under the deed
because the foreclosure was completed before the lawsuit was filed.  (See Complaint, ¶ 24.)  
Based upon the foregoing,
Defendant’s motion is denied.  Defendant
shall provide notice and file proof of such with the Court.