Judge: Stephen I. Goorvitch, Case: 23STCP01011, Date: 2025-02-19 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 23STCP01011 Hearing Date: February 19, 2025 Dept: 82
City of Los Angeles
v. Crest Apartments LP, et al.
Case No.
23STCP01011
[Tentative] Order
Granting Motion to Expunge Liens
The court
posts this tentative order on Monday, February 17, 2025, at approximately 12
Noon. The court provides notice: Unless there
is a request for oral argument on or before February 19, 2025, at 8:30 a.m., the
court will take the hearing off-calendar and shall issue this order. Any request for oral argument may be emailed
to the court’s clerk at the following email address: WRDept82@LACourt.org.
National
Equity Fund Inc. (“NEF”) moves to expunge two mechanic’s liens recorded against
the property known as SP7 Apartments Property, which is located at 519 East 7th
Street, Los Angeles, California 90014 (the “Property”). The first lien was recorded on June 14, 2023,
in the amount of $10,646.20. The second
lien was recorded on June 20, 2023, in the amount of $180,000. Both liens were recorded by United Guard
Security, Inc. (“UGS”). NEF served this
motion on UGS’s Chief Executive Officer and UGS’s counsel in a related
case. UGS has not filed any opposition
to this motion. The court grants this
motion for several reasons.
First, the mechanic’s liens were
recorded after the court placed the Property into receivership as part of the
Skid Row Housing Trust case. (See Court’s
Order, dated April 7, 2023.) USG did not
obtain court approval to record these liens.
Second, the mechanic’s liens relate
to services provided to properties other than the Property. (See Stephenson Decl. Exhs. A-D.) The record is clear that the Property’s owner
offered to pay the outstanding bill as it relates to security services for the
Property. (Id. Exh. D.)
Third, the mechanic’s liens
themselves are defective. The liens were
not recorded in a timely manner. UGS
failed to commence an action before this court within the requisite time period. The liens erroneously named the Skid Row
Housing Trust as the owner of the Property.
Fourth, UGS has not filed an
opposition or advanced any evidence demonstrating that the debts are valid. Nor has UGS addressed any of the deficiencies
in the liens.
Finally, this court has equitable
authority to extinguish any lien in connection with the sale of the
Property. (See City of Riverside v.
Horspool (2014) 223 Cal.App.4th 670, 684.)
The court finds that a failure to extinguish these liens would seriously
and negatively impact the low-income tenants who reside at the building and
undermine the purpose of the receivership.
Based upon the foregoing, the court
grants the motion by way of a separate, signed order. Counsel for NEF shall provide notice and file
proof of service with the court.