Judge: Stephen P. Pfahler, Case: 20CHCV00519, Date: 2022-09-06 Tentative Ruling



Case Number: 20CHCV00519    Hearing Date: September 6, 2022    Dept: F49

Dept. F-49

Date: 9-6-22

Case # 20CHCV00519

Trial Date: 6-12-23 c/f 1-9-23

 

COMPEL

 

MOVING PARTY: Defendants Farmers Insurance Exchange, Truck Insurance Exchange, Fire Insurance Exchange, Mid-Century Insurance Company, and Farmers New World Life Insurance Company

RESPONDING PARTY: Unopposed/Plaintiff, Vincent Kody Pappadato

 

RELIEF REQUESTED:

Motions to Compel Compliance with the April 6, 2022 Order

 

Motions for $1,325 in Sanctions

 

SUMMARY OF ACTION

In the operative Second Amended Complaint, Plaintiff Vincent Kody Pappadato alleges claims of fraud, negligent misrepresentation, and breach of contract against defendants Farmers Insurance Exchange, Truck Insurance Exchange, Fire Insurance Exchange, Mid-Century Insurance Company, Farmers New World Life, Foremost, Bristol West, Farmers Group, Inc. d/b/a Farmers Underwriters Association, and Lou DeAngelis.

 

RECOMMENDED RULING: Denied.

Defendants Farmers Insurance Exchange, Truck Insurance Exchange, Fire Insurance Exchange, Mid-Century Insurance Company, and Farmers New World Life move to compel compliance with the April 6, 2022 discovery order for production of responses to Form Interrogatories – Employment (set one) and Requests for Production of Documents (set one).

 

The court electronic filing system shows no opposition or reply at the time of the tentative ruling publication cutoff.

 

On April 6, 2022, the court ordered Plaintiff to serve responses to Request for Production of Documents (set one) and Form Interrogatories – Employment (set one) within 10 days. According to moving defendants, no responses have been received. Defendant moves under Code of Civil Procedure sections 2030.300 and 2031.320 seeking to compel compliance, but neither section provides a mechanism for enforcing an already existing order. Code of Civil Procedure section 2031.320 addresses a response whereby a party agrees to produce documents, not a court order. The court declines to find such a basis for the requested relief under these sections. The court therefore also declines to impose further monetary sanctions under the provided authority. (See Code Civ. Proc., §2023.030, subd. (b).)[1]

 

The motion is therefore denied.

 

Three motions for summary judgment set for March 20-22, 2023, with trial set for June 12, 2023.

 

Defendants to give notice.

 



[1]Nothing in the subject motion requests evidentiary or issue sanctions, due to a violation of a court order compelling discovery. The request for further monetary sanctions lacks proper support.