Judge: Steven A. Ellis, Case: 20STCV37213, Date: 2024-08-20 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 20STCV37213 Hearing Date: August 20, 2024 Dept: 29
Morris v. Bird Rides, Inc.
20STCV37213
Motion to be Relieved as Counsel, filed by Defendant’s Counsel Jillian E.
Stanley.
Tentative
The motion is
denied without prejudice.
Background
On September 29, 2020, Ashley Nicole Morris
(“Plaintiff”) filed a complaint against Bird Rides, Inc. (“Defendant”) and Does
1 through 50 for negligence arising out of a scooter accident occurring on June
4, 2020. On April 13, 2023, Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint, noting
the date of the accident was June 4, 2018.
Defendant has not filed an answer in this
matter.
On July 28, 2023, the Court approved a
stipulation of the parties staying the case pending resolution of the parties’
confidential mediation.
On October 27, 2023, Plaintiff’s counsel
appeared at an OSC re Status of Case and advised the Court that arbitration is
pending.
On January 11, 2024, Defendant filed a notice
that it had filed a Chapter 11 Petition in the United States District Court for
the Southern District of Florida and that, pursuant to federal law, an automatic
stay is in effect.
On July 16, 2024, Jillian E. Stanley (“Counsel”) filed this motion to be relieved as counsel. No opposition has been filed.
Legal
Standard
The court may order that an attorney be changed or
substituted at any time before or after judgment or final determination upon
request by either client or attorney and after notice from one to the other.
(Code of Civ. Proc., § 284(b).) An attorney is permitted to withdraw where
conflicts between the attorney and client make it unreasonable to continue the
representation. (See Cal. Rules of Prof. Conduct 3-700(C)(1).) “The
determination whether to grant or deny a motion to withdraw as counsel lies
within the sound discretion of the trial court.” (Manfredi & Levine v.
Superior Court (1998) 66 Cal.App.4th 1128, 1133.)
An application to be relieved as counsel must be made on
Judicial Counsel Form MC-051 (Notice of Motion and Motion) (Cal. Rules of
Court, rule 3.1362(a)), MC-052 (Declaration) (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1362(c)),
and MC-053 (Proposed Order) (Cal. Rules of Court, rule
3.1362(e)).
Further, the requisite forms must be served on the client
and all other parties who have appeared in the case. (Cal. Rules of Court,
rule 3.1362(d).) The court may delay effective date of the order relieving
counsel until proof of service of a copy of the signed order on the client has
been filed with the court. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1362(e).)
Discussion
Counsel has
filed the Notice, Declaration, and Order to be Relieved as Counsel. Counsel
served Defendant with the papers by personal service. Counsel contends the
bankruptcy case proceeds against Defendant, and as such, Counsel can no longer
represent Defendant without payment. Counsel states Defendant consents to the
withdrawal but does not have counsel to substitute.
As Counsel seeks an order as against Defendant, and as this matter remains subject to both the Court’s stay order of July 28, 2023, and the automatic stay of federal bankruptcy law, the Court denies the motion without prejudice, subject to being renewed once the automatic stay is lifted (or the bankruptcy court issues an order granting relief from stay) and this Court’s stay order is lifted.
Conclusion
The Court DENIES without prejudice the motion of counsel to
be relieved.
Moving counsel to give notice.