Judge: Steven A. Ellis, Case: 22STCV05110, Date: 2024-01-05 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 22STCV05110 Hearing Date: January 5, 2024 Dept: 29
Tentative
The motion to be relieved is GRANTED.
Background
On February 9, 2022, Morry Waksberg (“Plaintiff”)
filed a complaint relating to a slip and fall on February 16, 2020, against
Canters Fairfax, and DOES 1 through 50 for the cause of action Premise
Liability.
On December 6, 2023, Slava Kasreliovich
(“Counsel”) filed a motion to be relieved as counsel. No opposition has been
filed.
Legal
Standard
The court may order that an attorney be changed or
substituted at any time before or after judgment or final determination upon
request by either client or attorney and after notice from one to the other.
(Code of Civ. Proc., § 284(b).) An attorney is permitted to withdraw where
conflicts between the attorney and client make it unreasonable to continue the
representation. (See Cal. Rules of Prof. Conduct 3-700(C)(1).) “The
determination whether to grant or deny a motion to withdraw as counsel lies
within the sound discretion of the trial court.” (Manfredi & Levine v.
Superior Court (1998) 66 Cal.App.4th 1128, 1133.)
An application to be relieved as counsel must be made on Judicial
Counsel Form MC-051 (Notice of Motion and Motion) (Cal. Rules of Court, rule
3.1362(a)), MC-052 (Declaration) (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.136(c)), and
MC-053 (Proposed Order) (Cal. Rules of Court, rule
3.1362(e)).
Further, the requisite forms must be served on the client
and all other parties who have appeared in the case. (Cal. Rules of Court,
rule 3.1362(d).) The court may delay effective date of the order relieving
counsel until proof of service of a copy of the signed order on the client has
been filed with the court. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1362(e).)
Discussion
Counsel has
filed and served forms MC-051, MC-052, and MC-053 for Plaintiff. Counsel
declares there are irreconcilable differences and a breakdown in the
relationship between attorney and client. (MC-052s, No. 2.)
Trial is set for
May 16, 2024.
The Court finds
Counsel has satisfied the substantive requirements for the relief sought and
has – with one small exception – satisfied all of the procedural requirements
as well.
As to the
exception, the Court notes that Item No. 3 of the Proposed Order is blank, and
not filed out.
Based on the
information provided, the Court finds that the attorney has served the client
by mail and that Box 3b. should be checked.
With that
addition, the motion is GRANTED.
Conclusion
The motion to be
relieved as counsel is GRANTED.
In the proposed
order, boxes 3b and 5a are to be checked.
The order is effective upon the filing with the Court of the proof of
service of this signed order on the client.
Moving counsel
to give notice.