Judge: Steven A. Ellis, Case: 22STCV24347, Date: 2024-05-28 Tentative Ruling

Case Number: 22STCV24347    Hearing Date: May 28, 2024    Dept: 29

Motion to Substitute Successor in Interest for Plaintiff Janette Sanchez.

 

Tentative

The motion is granted.

Background

On July 28, 2022, Janette Sachez (“Plaintiff”) filed a complaint against Adan Ibarra (“Defendant”) for motor vehicle negligence and general negligence causes of action arising out of an automobile accident occurring on July 28, 2020.

 

On March 18, 2024, Plaintiff filed a notice of settlement.

 

Plaintiff has passed away.  On May 1, 2024, Matthew Bernardo Rodriguez (“Petitioner”) filed this motion for an order to be appointed Plaintiff’s successor in interest. No opposition has been filed.

 

Legal Standard

“A cause of action that survives the death of the person entitled to commence an action or proceeding passes to the decedent’s successor in interest . . . and an action may be commenced by the decedent’s personal representatives or, if none, by the decedent’s successor in interest.”  (Code Civ. Proc., § 377.30.)  After the death of a plaintiff, the court, on motion, shall allow a pending action that does not abate to be continued by the decedent’s personal representative or successor-in-interest.  (Code Civ. Proc., § 377.31.) 

The person who seeks to commence or continue a pending action as the decedent’s successor-in-interest shall execute and file an affidavit or declaration that includes (1) the decedent’s name; (2) the date and place of decedent’s death; (3) “No proceeding is now pending in California for administration of the decedent’s estate”; (4) a copy of the final order showing the distribution of the decedent’s cause of action to the successor-in-interest, if the decedent’s estate was administered; (5) either the declarant is the decedent’s successor in interest or the declarant is authorized to act on behalf of the decedent’s successor in interest, with facts in support thereof; (6) “No other person has a superior right to commence the action or proceeding or to be substituted for the decedent in the pending action or proceeding”; and (7) that the statements are true, under penalty of perjury.  (Code Civ. Proc., § 377.32, subd. (a).)  The affidavit or declaration must attach a certified copy of the decedent’s death certificate.  (Code Civ. Proc., § 377.32, subd. (c).)

Discussion

Plaintiff died on July 22, 2021, before filing of the complaint. Petitioner is not listed on the complaint bringing this action against Defendant.

“[Code of Civil Procedure section 377.32] provision does not require that the affidavit be filed as a condition precedent to commencing or continuing the action. However, failure to file the affidavit could possibly subject the action to a plea in abatement.” (Parsons v. Tickner (1995) 31 Cal.App.4th 1513, 1523–1524.)

In light of Plaintiff’s death, her son, Matthew Bernardo Rodriguez, Petitioner, is her  successor in interest to the Estate of Plaintiff.

Petitioner moves for an order permitting his substitution as the successor in Interest to Plaintiff’s causes of action.

The Declaration of Matthew Bernardo Rodriguez includes:

(1) the decedent’s name, Janette Sanchez;

(2) the date of Plaintiff’s death, July 22, 2021;

(3) that there is no proceeding now pending in California for the administration of Plaintiff’s estate;

(4) that he Plaintiff’s successor in interest;

(5) that no other person has a superior right to be substituted in for Plaintiff;

(6) and Petitioner declares these statements are true under penalty of perjury.

A copy of Plaintiff’s death certificate is attached to this motion. (Shakhbazyan Decl., ¶ 2Exh. B.)

Petitioner’s unopposed motion satisfies all substantive and procedural requirements.  It is granted.

Petitioner also requests the Court order him Special Administrator for Plaintiff for the purpose of this case.  That request is DENIED.  He may continue to prosecute this action as Plaintiff’s successor in interest pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 377.31 – no less and no more.

Conclusion

 

The Court GRANTS Petitioner’s motion to be substituted as successor in interest for Plaintiff.

Moving party is ORDERED to give notice.