Judge: Steven A. Ellis, Case: 22STCV38570, Date: 2025-03-10 Tentative Ruling

Case Number: 22STCV38570    Hearing Date: March 10, 2025    Dept: 29

Kemper Insurance Company v. Ferguson
22STCV38570

Petition for Order Striking and Releasing Lien or Other Encumbrance on Property of Public Officer or Employee filed by Petitioner Neenah A. Ferguson

 

Tentative

 

The hearing on the petition is continued.  Petitioner is ordered to serve all parties and to file proof of service with the Court.

 

Background 

 

On December 12, 2022, Kemper Insurance Company (“Plaintiff”) filed this subrogation action against Defendant Neenah Ferguson (“Defendant”) and Does 1 to 20, inclusive, asserting one cause of action for general negligence. The Complaint alleges that Plaintiff insured Jonathan Little (“Little”) under a homeowner’s policy and made payments to Little under the policy for damages that Plaintiff alleges were caused by Defendant.

 

On February 13, 2024, default was entered against Defendant. 

 

On April 25, 2024, Plaintiff dismissed the Doe defendants.

 

On September 10, 2024, the Court entered default judgment against Defendant for $35,177.73, consisting of $33,354.96 in damages, $1,202.60 in prejudgment interest, and $620.17 in costs.

 

On February 13, 2025, Defendant filed the instant Petition for Order Striking and Releasing Lien or Other Encumbrance on Property of Public Officer or Employee. Defendant also appealed the order entering default judgment.

 

Legal Standard

 

 “A person shall not file or record, or direct another to file or record, a lawsuit, lien, or other encumbrance, including a notice of lis pendens, against another person or entity knowing it is false, with the intent to harass the person or entity or to influence or hinder the person in discharging his or her official duties if the person is a public officer or employee.”  (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 765.010, subd. (b).) “‘Harass’ means engage in knowing and willful conduct that serves no legitimate purpose.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 765.010, subd. (a)(1).)

 

“A person or entity whose property is subject to a lien or encumbrance in violation of this section [i.e., Code Civ. Proc., § 765.010] may petition the superior court of the county in which the person or entity resides or in which the property is located for an order, which may be granted ex parte, directing the lien or other encumbrance claimant to appear at a hearing before the court and show cause why the lien or other encumbrance should not be stricken and other relief provided by this article should not be granted.’’ (Code Civ. Proc., § 765.010, subd. (c)(1).)

 

“A petition under this article shall state the grounds upon which relief is requested, and shall be supported by the affidavit of the petitioner or the petitioner’s attorney setting forth a concise statement of the facts upon which the motion is based.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 765.020.)

 

“The court shall schedule the hearing no earlier than 14 days after the date of the order. The scheduled date of the hearing shall allow adequate time for notice of the hearing.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 765.010, subd. (c)(2).)

 

“If the court determines that the lien or other encumbrance is in violation of Section 765.010, the court shall issue an order striking and releasing the lien or other encumbrance and may award costs and reasonable attorney’s fees to the petitioner to be paid by the lien or other encumbrance claimant. If the court determines that the lien or other encumbrance is valid, the court shall issue an order so stating and may award costs and reasonable attorney’s fees to the encumbrance claimant to be paid by the petitioner. The court may direct that an order issued pursuant to this section be recorded.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 765.030.)

 

Discussion               

 

Defendant has filed a petition for Order Striking and Releasing Lien or Other Encumbrance on Property of Public Officer or Employee, arguing that the lien on a property known as 6428 Blaisdell Ave. S. Richfield, MN 55423 is illegal because that property does not belong to the Defendant. In the petition, Defendant asks the Court to (1) set an Order to Show Cause why the lien should not be stricken and released, and (2) enter an order striking and releasing that lien. (Petition, Item 9.)

 

However, the Court notes that Defendant did not file proof of service of the petition with the Court. (See Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1300(c) [“Proof of service of the moving papers must be filed no later than five court days before the time appointed for the hearing”].)

 

Therefore, the Court will continue the hearing and require Defendant to serve her petition on Plaintiff and file a proof of service before the next hearing date.

Conclusion 

The Petition for Order Striking and Releasing Lien or Other Encumbrance on Property of Public Officer or Employee filed by Petitioner Neenah A. Ferguson is CONTINUED for approximately 30 days to 4/__/ 25, at 1:30 PM, Dept. 29, Spring Street Courthouse. Defendant Neenah Ferguson is ordered to serve her petition on Plaintiff Kemper Insurance Company. Defendant is further ordered to file, at least 5 days before the next hearing, proof of service of that petition.

Moving party to give notice.