Judge: Teresa A. Beaudet, Case: 18STCV00867, Date: 2023-03-03 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 18STCV00867 Hearing Date: March 3, 2023 Dept: 50
JNS Collective, llc, Plaintiff, vs. mora’s cutting and finishing, et al. Defendants. |
Case No.: |
18STCV00867 |
Hearing Date: |
March 3, 2023 |
|
Hearing
Time: 8:30 a.m. ORDER RE: DEFENDANT JOEL RICO’S DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFF’S THIRD AMENDED
COMPLAINT |
Background
On October
11, 2018, Plaintiff JNS Collective, LLC (“Plaintiff”) filed this action
against Defendants Mora’s Cutting and Finishing aka Mora’s Cutting and Sewing
and Joel Rico (“Rico”).
On August 30, 2022,
Plaintiff filed the operative Third Amended Complaint (“TAC”), asserting causes
of action for (1) breach of contract and (2) fraud.
Rico now demurs to both of the causes of action of the TAC.[1] Plaintiff opposes.
Discussion
As an initial matter, the Court notes that Rico did not
file any declaration demonstrating that the parties met and conferred by
telephone or in person in advance of Rico filing the instant demurrer.
Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 430.41,
subdivision (a), “[b]efore filing a
demurrer pursuant to this chapter, the demurring party shall meet and
confer in person or by telephone with the party who filed the pleading
that is subject to demurrer for the purpose of determining whether an agreement
can be reached that would resolve the objections to be raised in the demurrer.”
(Emphasis added.) “The demurring
party shall file and serve with the demurrer a declaration stating either of
the following: (A) The means by which the demurring party met and
conferred with the party who filed the pleading subject to demurrer, and that
the parties did not reach an agreement resolving the objections raised in the
demurrer. (B) That the party who filed the pleading subject to
demurrer failed to respond to the meet and confer request of the demurring
party or otherwise failed to meet and confer in good faith.” (Code Civ. Proc., §
430.41, subd. (a)(3).)
Such meeting and conferring
must be done in good faith with an effort to try to resolve the issues subject
to the demurrer.
In light
of the foregoing, the hearing on Rico’s demurrer is continued to May 3, 2023
at 2 p.m. in Dept. 50.¿
Rico is¿ordered
to meet¿and confer¿with Plaintiff¿within 10 days of the date of this order.¿If
the parties are unable to resolve the pleading issues¿or if the parties are
otherwise unable to meet and confer in good faith, Rico is to¿thereafter¿file
and serve¿a declaration setting forth the efforts to meet and confer in
compliance with¿Code of Civil Procedure section 430.41, subdivision (a)(3)
within 15 days of this order.¿
Rico is ordered to give notice of this order.¿
DATED:
Hon. Teresa A.
Beaudet
Judge, Los
Angeles Superior Court
[1]The Court notes that the docket entry for Rico’s demurrer
references a Motion
to Strike, but such motion does not appear to have been filed.