Judge: Teresa A. Beaudet, Case: 20STCV49938, Date: 2024-01-08 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 20STCV49938 Hearing Date: January 8, 2024 Dept: 50
|
ALBRIK LEVICK GHARIBIAN,
Plaintiff, vs. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, et
al. Defendants. |
Case No.: |
20STCV49938 |
|
Hearing Date: |
January 8, 2024 |
|
|
Hearing Time: |
10:00 a.m. |
|
|
ORDER RE: MOTION FOR ORDER
COMPELLING RESPONSES TO FORM INTERROGATORIES – EMPLOYMENT LAW, SET ONE (1),
AND FOR SANCTIONS IN THE AMOUNT OF $3,202.50 AGAINST PLAINTIFF AND HIS
ATTORNEYS, MNATZ LAW GROUP |
||
Defendant County of Los
Angeles (“Defendant”) moves for an order compelling Plaintiff Albrik
Levick Gharibian (“Plaintiff”) to serve responses to Form Interrogatories –
Employment Law, Set One (1) in its entirety. Defendant also seeks an order
imposing a monetary sanction against Plaintiff and his attorneys, Mnatz Law
Group, in the amount of $3,202.50.
Defendant’s motion will be continued to a new date as set forth below.
NO HEARING WILL TAKE PLACE ON JANUARY 8, 2024.
Pursuant to the
Court’s power to “amend and control its process and orders so as to make them
conform to law and justice” (Code Civ. Proc., § 128, subd. (a)(8)), the Court
orders the parties in this case to participate in an Informal Discovery
Conference (“IDC”). (Note:¿The Court’s policy regarding IDCs appears in the
Courtroom Information available in Dept. 50 and on the Court’s website.)¿Lead
or other designated counsel for the parties with full authority are ordered to
participate in person in an IDC. After consulting with opposing counsel
regarding available dates, Defendant must make
a prompt reservation for the IDC using the Court’s online reservation system. Defendant must file Dept. 50’s one-page IDC form in the department
seven days prior to the IDC, and the responding parties may file the same form
in the department setting forth a response three days prior to the IDC.
Once Defendant has
confirmed an IDC date, Defendant must use the
Court’s online reservation system to continue the motion to a post-IDC
discovery hearing date. The parties are ordered to have with them whatever
materials are needed to make the IDC session productive and successful. Prior
to the IDC date, lead or other designated counsel for the parties, with full
authority, are to meet and confer, in person or via telephone
in a further attempt to resolve as many of the issues as possible before
the IDC. (See CRC Rule 3.670, subd. (f)(2).) If the parties resolve
their discovery disputes before the IDC date, Defendant is ordered to take both the IDC and the motion off
calendar as soon as possible.
Defendant is ordered to provide notice of this Order.
DATED:
Hon. Teresa A.
Beaudet
Judge, Los
Angeles Superior Court