Judge: Teresa A. Beaudet, Case: 21STCV03095, Date: 2023-03-28 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 21STCV03095 Hearing Date: March 28, 2023 Dept: 50
|
CAROL
M. SONI (AKA SYLMARAH BARUTI), et al. Plaintiffs, vs. KIM
B. PRIESTLEY, et al. Defendants. |
Case No.: |
21STCV03095 |
|
Hearing Date: |
March 28, 2023 |
|
|
Hearing Time: |
10:00 a.m. |
|
|
ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS KIM
B. PRIESTLEY AND DARRYL H. PRIESTLEY’S MOTION TO DEEM REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION,
SET TWO, ADMITTED AND REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,410.00 |
||
Defendants
Kim B. Priestly and Darryl H. Priestly (jointly, “Defendants”)
move for an order deeming their Requests for Admission, Set Two, propounded
upon Plaintiff Carol M. Soni (“Plaintiff”) be deemed admitted and conclusively
established for all purposes in this action, and for sanctions in the amount of
$2,410.00 against Plaintiff.
Defendants’ motion will be continued to a new date as set
forth below. NO HEARING WILL TAKE PLACE ON MARCH 28, 2023.
Pursuant to the
Court’s power to “amend and control its process and orders so as to make them
conform to law and justice” (Code Civ. Proc., § 128(a)(8)), the Court orders
the parties in this case to participate in an Informal Discovery Conference
(“IDC”). (Note:¿The Court’s policy regarding IDCs appears in the Courtroom
Information available in Dept. 50 and on the Court’s website.)¿Lead or
other designated counsel for the parties with full authority are ordered to
participate in person in an IDC. After consulting with opposing counsel
regarding available dates, Defendants must make a prompt reservation for the
IDC using the Court’s online reservation system. Defendants must file Dept.
50’s one-page IDC form in the department seven days prior to the IDC, and the
responding parties may file the same form in the department setting forth a
response three days prior to the IDC.
Once Defendants have confirmed an IDC date, Defendants must
use the Court’s online reservation system to continue the motion to a post-IDC
discovery hearing date. The parties are ordered to have with them whatever
materials are needed to make the IDC session productive and successful. Prior
to the IDC date, lead or other designated counsel for the parties, with full
authority, are to meet and confer, in person or via telephone
in a further attempt to resolve as many of the issues as possible before
the IDC. (See CRC Rule 3.670(f)(2).) If the parties resolve their
discovery disputes before the IDC date, Defendants are ordered to take both the
IDC and the motion off calendar as soon as possible.
Defendants are ordered to provide notice of this Order.
DATED:
Hon. Teresa A.
Beaudet
Judge, Los
Angeles Superior Court