Judge: Teresa A. Beaudet, Case: 21STCV28284, Date: 2025-01-14 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 21STCV28284 Hearing Date: January 14, 2025 Dept: 50
ARMANDO VAZQUEZ-RAMOS, as Successor Trustee of the LOURDES
R. VAZQUEZ FAMILY LIVING TRUST of 2004,
Plaintiff, vs. ANTONIO RAMOS VAZQUEZ, in his individual capacity, et al. Defendants. |
Case No.: |
21STCV28284 |
Hearing Date: |
January 14, 2025 |
|
Hearing Time: |
2:00 p.m. |
|
[TENTATIVE]
ORDER RE: ANTONIO RAMOS
VAZQUEZ’ MOTION TO REPLACE ARMANDO VAZQUEZ RAMOS AS THE PLAINTIFF AND DISMISS
COMPLAINT |
||
AND RELATED CROSS-ACTION |
|
Background
Plaintiff Armando Vazquez-Ramos, as Successor Trustee of the Lourdes R.
Vazquez Family Living Trust of 2004 (“Plaintiff”) filed this action on July 30,
2021 against, inter alia, defendants Antonio Ramos Vazquez, in his
individual capacity, and Antonio Ramos Vazquez, in his capacities as cotrustee
and beneficiary of the Vazquez-Castillo Family Trust of 2007.
Plaintiff filed
the operative Verified First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) on December 5, 2023,
alleging causes of action for (1) quiet title to real property and for
injunctive relief, (2) constructive trust, (3) accounting, (4) tort of deceit,
and (5) cancellation of instruments.
On
February 6, 2024, Antonio Ramos Vazquez, in his individual
capacity and as co-trustee of the Vazquez Brothers Living Trust of 2006, and Fernando Ramos
Vazquez, in his individual capacity and as co-trustee of the
Vazquez Brothers Living Trust of 2006 (jointly, “Cross-Complainants”) filed a
Cross-Complaint against Armando Vazquez-Ramos, in his individual
capacity and as co-trustee of the Vazquez Brothers Living Trust of 2006, and
Roe 1, in his or her capacity as Personal Representative of the Estate of
Lourdes R. Vazquez. On
May 14, 2024, Cross-Complainants filed the operative First Amended
Cross-Complaint, alleging causes of action for (1) reformation of deeds and (2)
declaratory relief.
Antonio Ramos
Vazquez, Successor Trustee of the
Lourdes R. Vazquez Family Living Trust of 2004 (herein, “Antonio Ramos Vazquez”) now moves “for an
order to replace ARMANDO VAZQUEZ RAMOS as the Plaintiff in this action and
dismiss Case No. 21STCV28284 with prejudice.” The motion is unopposed.
Discussion
As set forth above, Antonio Ramos Vazquez moves “for an order to replace
ARMANDO VAZQUEZ RAMOS as the Plaintiff in this action and dismiss Case No.
21STCV28284 with prejudice.” (Mot. at p. 2:5-6.)
In the motion, Antonio Ramos
Vazquez indicates that Armando
Vazquez-Ramos passed away on August 4, 2024. (Potier Decl., ¶ 4,
Ex. A.) Antonio Ramos Vazquez asserts
that “Plaintiff ARMANDO’s lawsuit was based on his position as
Successor Trustee of the Lourdes R. Vazquez Family Living Trust Agreement of
2004. Therefore, he no longer has standing to pursue this case. Pursuant to the
Lourdes R. Vazquez Trust Agreement, Article I, ANTONIO is the current Successor
Trustee of the Trust upon the death of ARMANDO.” (Mot. at pp.
3:25-4:1.) Antonio Ramos Vazquez points to
Exhibit B of his counsel’s declaration, which is titled “Affidavit of Successor
Trustee.” (Potier Decl., ¶ 6, Ex. B.)
The “Affidavit of Successor
Trustee” provides, inter alia, that “[t]he Trust is known
as the Lourdes R. Vazquez Family Living Trust Agreement of 2004 (‘Trust’).” (Potier Decl., ¶ 6, Ex. B.) The
Affidavit identifies Armando Vazquez Ramos as the “Previous Trustee” and
Antonio Ramos Vazquez as the “Successor Trustee(s).” (Ibid.)
Antonio Ramos Vazquez asserts
that “[a]s the trusteeship of the Trust has been transferred to
ANTONIO as the successor trustee, the Court should allow him to substitute in
as the Plaintiff in this action.” (Mot.
at p. 4:12-15.) Antonio Ramos Vazquez cites
to Code
of Civil Procedure section 368.5, which provides that “[a]n action or proceeding does not abate by
the transfer of an interest in the action or proceeding or by any other
transfer of an interest. The action or proceeding may be continued in the name
of the original party, or the court may allow the person to whom the transfer
is made to be substituted in the action or proceeding.” However, Antonio Ramos Vazquez does not
appear to demonstrate that there was a “transfer of an interest in the [instant] action” from
Plaintiff to Antonio
Ramos Vazquez. (Code Civ. Proc., § 368.5.) In
addition, Code of Civil Procedure section 368.5 is the only
legal authority cited in support of the motion.
Moreover, the “Affidavit of
Successor Trustee” provided by Antonio Ramos Vazquez indicates that “[t]he
Trust is known as the Lourdes R. Vazquez Family Living Trust Agreement
of 2004,” but the Plaintiff named in the operative FAC in this action is Armando
Vazquez-Ramos, as Successor Trustee of the Lourdes R. Vazquez Family Living
Trust of 2004.” (Potier Decl., ¶ 6, Ex. B, emphasis added; FAC,
p. 1.) Thus, the name of the Trust identified in the “Affidavit of Successor Trustee” does not exactly match the name
of the Plaintiff in this action.
Antonio Ramos Vazquez also
asserts that “[a]s the current successor trustee of the Lourdes
R. Vazquez Trust and Plaintiff in this action, ANTONIO has the authority to
dismiss this action and requests this court order the dismissal of the First
Amended Complaint with prejudice.” (Mot. at p. 4:17-20.) However, Antonio Ramos Vazquez does not
cite to any legal authority to support this proposition.
Based on the foregoing, the
Court does not find that Antonio Ramos Vazquez has demonstrated grounds to “replace
ARMANDO VAZQUEZ RAMOS as the Plaintiff in this action and dismiss Case No. 21
STCV28284 with prejudice.” (Mot. at p. 2:5-6.)
Conclusion
Based
on the foregoing, Antonio
Ramos Vazquez’s motion is denied in its entirety.
///
///
///
Antonio Ramos Vazquez is
ordered to provide notice of this ruling.
DATED: January 14, 2025 ________________________________
Hon. Teresa A.
Beaudet
Judge, Los
Angeles Superior Court