Judge: Teresa A. Beaudet, Case: 22STCV11937, Date: 2023-04-03 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 22STCV11937 Hearing Date: April 3, 2023 Dept: 50
|
JAYESH KUMAR, Plaintiff, vs. THE CITY LOS ANGELES, et al., Defendants. |
Case No.: |
22STCV11937 |
|
Hearing Date: |
April 3, 2023 |
|
|
Hearing Time: |
2:00
p.m. |
|
|
ORDER RE: DEFENDANT THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES’ DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFF’S SECOND AMENDED
COMPLAINT |
||
|
AND RELATED CROSS-ACTIONS |
|
|
Background
On April 7, 2022,
Plaintiff Jayesh Kumar (“Plaintiff”)
filed the instant action
against a number of defendants, including the City of Los Angeles (the “City”).
Plaintiff filed the
operative Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) on November 28, 2022. The SAC
asserts causes of action for (1) breach of lease, (2) nuisance, (3) trespass,
and (4) dangerous condition of public property.
The City now demurs to
the second, third, and fourth causes of action of the SAC. Plaintiff opposes.
Discussion
As an initial matter, the Court notes that the City’s
counsel’s declaration filed in support of the demurrer indicates that “[o]n December 22, 2022, I sent a meet and confer letter to
Plaintiff’s counsel concerning my intent to demurrer to Plaintiff’s causes of
action for nuisance and trespass on behalf of Defendant, The City of Los Angeles. I did not receive a response.” (Le
Decl., ¶ 2.)
The Court notes that the City’s counsel’s declaration does
not demonstrate that the parties met and conferred by telephone or in person.
Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 430.41, subdivision (a), “[b]efore filing a
demurrer pursuant to this chapter, the demurring party shall meet and
confer in person or by telephone with the party who filed the pleading
that is subject to demurrer for the purpose of determining whether an agreement
can be reached that would resolve the objections to be raised in the demurrer. If an amended complaint,
cross-complaint, or answer is filed, the responding party shall meet and confer
again with the party who filed the amended pleading before filing a demurrer to
the amended pleading.” (Emphasis added.)
Such meeting and conferring
must be done in good faith with an effort to try to resolve the issues subject
to the demurrer.
In light
of the foregoing, the hearing on the City’s demurrer is continued to May 23, 2023 at 2 p.m. in Dept. 50.¿
The City is to
meet¿and confer¿with Plaintiff¿within 10 days of the date of this order.¿If the
parties are unable to resolve the pleading issues¿or if the parties are
otherwise unable to meet and confer in good faith, the City is
to¿thereafter¿file and serve¿a declaration setting forth the efforts to meet
and confer in compliance with¿Code of Civil Procedure section 430.41,
subdivision (a)(3) within 15 days of this order.¿
The City is ordered to give notice of this order.¿
DATED: ¿April 3, 2023
________________________________
Hon.
Teresa A. Beaudet
Judge, Los
Angeles Superior Court