Judge: Teresa A. Beaudet, Case: 22STCV15736, Date: 2023-01-13 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 22STCV15736 Hearing Date: January 13, 2023 Dept: 50
|
LONG BEACH
VICTORIA GROUP, LLC, Plaintiff, vs. SARGIS
KHACHATRYAN, et al., Defendants. |
Case No.: |
22STCV15736 |
|
Hearing Date: |
January 13, 2023 |
|
|
Hearing Time: |
10:00 a.m. |
|
|
[TENTATIVE] ORDER
RE: PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT |
||
Plaintiff
Long Beach Victoria Group, LLC (“Plaintiff”) requests
entry of default judgment against Defendant Sargis
Khachatryan.
Plaintiff seeks judgment in the total amount of $328,481.52, comprising $299,300.00
demanded in the Complaint, $23,358.27 in interest, $558.25 in costs, and $5,265
in attorney fees.
The
Court notes a number of defects with the submitted default judgment package.
First,
there is no allegation of any amount of damages in the Complaint. “
Second, Item 1(a) of the Request for Court
Judgment (Form CIV-100) incorrectly indicates that the Complaint in this action
was filed on June 6, 2022. The Complaint was filed on May 11, 2022.
Third, the declaration of Shira Zaghi filed in support of
the request attaches as Exhibit A to the declaration a copy of the subject
Retail Fuel Facility Lease and amendments to the lease. (Zaghi Decl., ¶ 2, Ex.
A.) The Court notes that the copy of the lease provided is not signed by the Landlord.
(
Fourth, Paragraph 12 of
Ms. Zaghi’s
declaration asserts that Defendant owes Plaintiff a principal amount of
$299,300.00 (Zaghi Decl., ¶ 12.) However, the amounts set forth in subdivisions
(a)-(c) of paragraph 12 of the declaration add up to $298,665.00, not
$299,300.00. In addition, Ms. Zaghi indicates that as of the date of her
declaration (October 31, 2022), Defendant owes Plaintiff $114,300 in unpaid
rent from April 1, 2021 through October 31, 2021, or “19 months x $6,350.”
(Zaghi Decl., ¶ 12(b).) The Court notes that April 1, 2021 to October 31, 2021
is not a total of 19 months. In addition, Exhibit E to Ms. Zaghi’s declaration,
a “Notice to Pay and Remove Gas Tanks,” states that the balance of base rent
owed by Defendant is $69,850. (Zaghi Decl., ¶ 12, Ex. E, p. 1.) It is also
unclear how Plaintiff calculated the requested $5,715.00 in late fees. (Zaghi
Decl., ¶ 12(c).)
Fifth, Item 7 of Plaintiff’s Request for Court
Judgment (the Memorandum of Costs) lists $11.25 for “
Sixth, Plaintiff has not sought to dismiss doe
defendants. A party seeking a default judgment must file “[a] dismissal of all
parties against whom judgment is not sought or an application for separate
judgment against specified parties under
Lastly, it is unclear what Plaintiff’s counsel’s
hourly billing rate is, as Plaintiff’s counsel indicates in her declaration
that her hourly rate is both $400 and $450. (Martin Decl., ¶¶ 5, 6.)
Plaintiff’s counsel indicates that she spent a total of 11.7 hours on this
case. (Martin Decl., ¶ 6.) If Plaintiff’s counsel’s hourly rate is $400, $400 x
11.7 equals $4,680.00, an amount less than the requested $5,265.00 in
attorney’s fees.
Accordingly,
the Court denies Plaintiff’s request for default judgment without prejudice. The
Clerk will discuss with Plaintiff a schedule for resubmission of the default
judgment package.
DATED: January 13, 2022 ________________________________
Hon.
Teresa A. Beaudet
Judge,
Los Angeles Superior Court