Judge: Teresa A. Beaudet, Case: 24STCV00679, Date: 2024-08-02 Tentative Ruling

Case Number: 24STCV00679    Hearing Date: August 2, 2024    Dept: 50

 

 

 

Superior Court of California

County of Los Angeles

Department 50

 

TIMOTHY D. REUBEN, INC., a California professional corporation, d/b/a REUBEN RAUCHER & BLUM,

                        Plaintiff,

            vs.

MICHAEL WINTER, et al.,

                        Defendants.

Case No.:

24STCV00679

Hearing Date:

August 2, 2024

Hearing Time:

10:00 a.m. 

[TENTATIVE] ORDER RE: 

 

PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT

 

           

Plaintiff Timothy D. Reuben, Inc., a California professional corporation, d/b/a Reuben Raucher & Blum (“Plaintiff”) requests entry of default judgment against Defendants Michael Winter, Federal Street Holdings, LLC, Van Ness Partners I LLC, and RN Management, LLC. Plaintiff requests judgment in the total amount of $80,104.73, comprising $75,367.53 in damages, $855.00 in costs, and $3,882.20 in interest.   

The Court notes one defect with the submitted default judgment package. 

In the supporting Declaration of Stephen L. Raucher, Mr. Raucher states that “Defendants’ balance as of September 30, 2021 was $61,234.82.” (Raucher Decl., ¶ 28, emphasis added.) However, Mr. Raucher also states that “[i]n total, Defendants contributed only $47,399.01 in payments, while NAI paid $217,297.06. In total, $264,696.07 was paid out of the $340,063.60 owed to RRB, leaving a balance of $75,367.53 owing as of October 31, 2023.” (Raucher Decl., ¶ 29, emphasis added.) In addition, Plaintiff’s case summary asserts that “Defendants defaulted on their obligation to pay Plaintiff’s fees, leaving $61,234.82 of legal services rendered and costs advanced by RRB unpaid.” (Plaintiff’s Case Summary at p. 3:14-16.) Thus, it is unclear what amount of damages is owed. Although Plaintiff seeks $75,367.53 in damages in connection with the instant request, Plaintiff appears to state that only $61,234.82 is owed.

            In addition, Mr. Raucher states that “RRB ceased performing all legal services

by August 31, 2021,” and that “Defendants’ balance as of September 30, 2021 was $61,234.82.” (Raucher Decl., ¶¶ 28-29.) Thus, it is unclear why Plaintiff asserts that $75,367.53 is owed if Defendants’ balance as of September 30, 2021 was $61,234.82. (Ibid.)

Based on the foregoing, the Court denies Plaintiff’s request for default judgment without prejudice. The Court will discuss with Plaintiff a schedule for resubmission of the default judgment package.

 

DATED:  August 2, 2024                               ________________________________

Hon. Teresa A. Beaudet

Judge, Los Angeles Superior Court