Judge: Teresa A. Beaudet, Case: 24STCV09594, Date: 2025-05-29 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 24STCV09594 Hearing Date: May 29, 2025 Dept: 50
| 
   PAUL SCARBOROUGH, et al.,                         Plaintiffs,             vs. EASTWESTPROTO, INC., et al.                          Defendants.  | 
  
   Case No.:  | 
  
   24STCV09594  | 
 
| 
   Hearing Date:  | 
  May 29, 2025  | 
 |
| 
   Hearing Time:  | 
  
    10:00 a.m.  | 
  
 |
| 
   ORDER RE:   MOTION TO QUASH
  DEPOSITION SUBPOENAS AND FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER  | 
 ||
| 
   | 
  
   | 
 |
Defendant Maxim Gorin
moves to quash ten subpoenas for production of business records issued by
Plaintiffs and for a protective order.
Defendant’s motion will be continued to a
new date as set forth below. NO HEARING WILL TAKE PLACE ON MAY 29, 2025.  (Note: 
Dept. 50 also will be dark that day.)
Pursuant to the
Court’s power to “amend and control its process and orders so as to make them
conform to law and justice” (Code Civ. Proc., § 128, subd. (a)(8)), the Court
orders the parties and, if needed, the third parties subject to the subpoenas
in this case, to participate in a meet and confer with the Court (“Informal
Discovery Conference” or “IDC”). Lead or other designated counsel for
the parties and third parties with full authority are ordered to participate in
person in an IDC. After consulting with opposing and third-party counsel
regarding available dates, Plaintiff must make
a prompt reservation for the IDC using the Court’s online reservation system. Plaintiff must file Dept. 50’s one-page IDC form in the department
seven days prior to the IDC,[1] and the responding parties may file the same form in the
department setting forth a response three days prior to the IDC.  COURTESY COPIES OF THE IDC
STATEMENTS ARE TO BE DELIVERED TO DEPT. 50 CONCURRENTLY WITH THEIR filing. 
Once Plaintiff has
confirmed an IDC date, Plaintiff must use the
Court’s online reservation system to continue the motion to a post-IDC
discovery hearing date. The parties and third party are ordered to have with
them whatever materials are needed to make the IDC session productive and
successful. Prior to the IDC date, lead or other designated counsel for the
parties and third party, with full authority, are to meet and confer, in
person or via telephone in a further attempt to resolve as
many of the issues as possible before the IDC. (See CRC Rule 3.670,
subd. (f)(2).) If the parties resolve their discovery disputes before the IDC
date, Plaintiff is ordered to take both the
IDC and the motion off calendar as soon as possible.
Plaintiff is ordered to provide notice of this Order.
DATED:  
Hon. Teresa A.
Beaudet
Judge, Los
Angeles Superior Court
[1]
Be sure to comply with the filing requirements of the reservation system so the
reservation is not deleted for failing to file the requisite documents in time.