Judge: Teresa A. Beaudet, Case: 24STCV09594, Date: 2025-05-29 Tentative Ruling



Case Number: 24STCV09594    Hearing Date: May 29, 2025    Dept: 50

 

 

Superior Court of California

County of Los Angeles

Department 50

 

PAUL SCARBOROUGH, et al.,

                        Plaintiffs,

            vs.

 

EASTWESTPROTO, INC., et al.

                        Defendants.

Case No.:

24STCV09594

Hearing Date:

May 29, 2025

Hearing Time:

10:00 a.m.

ORDER RE: 

 

MOTION TO QUASH DEPOSITION SUBPOENAS AND FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER

 

 

 

Defendant Maxim Gorin moves to quash ten subpoenas for production of business records issued by Plaintiffs and for a protective order.

Defendant’s motion will be continued to a new date as set forth below. NO HEARING WILL TAKE PLACE ON MAY 29, 2025.  (Note:  Dept. 50 also will be dark that day.)

Pursuant to the Court’s power to “amend and control its process and orders so as to make them conform to law and justice” (Code Civ. Proc., § 128, subd. (a)(8)), the Court orders the parties and, if needed, the third parties subject to the subpoenas in this case, to participate in a meet and confer with the Court (“Informal Discovery Conference” or “IDC”). Lead or other designated counsel for the parties and third parties with full authority are ordered to participate in person in an IDC. After consulting with opposing and third-party counsel regarding available dates, Plaintiff must make a prompt reservation for the IDC using the Court’s online reservation system. Plaintiff must file Dept. 50’s one-page IDC form in the department seven days prior to the IDC,[1] and the responding parties may file the same form in the department setting forth a response three days prior to the IDC.  COURTESY COPIES OF THE IDC STATEMENTS ARE TO BE DELIVERED TO DEPT. 50 CONCURRENTLY WITH THEIR filing.

Once Plaintiff has confirmed an IDC date, Plaintiff must use the Court’s online reservation system to continue the motion to a post-IDC discovery hearing date. The parties and third party are ordered to have with them whatever materials are needed to make the IDC session productive and successful. Prior to the IDC date, lead or other designated counsel for the parties and third party, with full authority, are to meet and confer, in person or via telephone in a further attempt to resolve as many of the issues as possible before the IDC. (See CRC Rule 3.670, subd. (f)(2).) If the parties resolve their discovery disputes before the IDC date, Plaintiff is ordered to take both the IDC and the motion off calendar as soon as possible.

Plaintiff is ordered to provide notice of this Order.

 

DATED:  May 21, 2025                                 ________________________________

Hon. Teresa A. Beaudet

Judge, Los Angeles Superior Court

 



[1] Be sure to comply with the filing requirements of the reservation system so the reservation is not deleted for failing to file the requisite documents in time.





Website by Triangulus