Judge: Teresa A. Beaudet, Case: 24STCV15897, Date: 2024-11-06 Tentative Ruling



Case Number: 24STCV15897    Hearing Date: November 6, 2024    Dept: 50


 

Superior Court of California

County of Los Angeles

Department 50

 

RICHARD BOWER,

 

                        Plaintiff,

            vs.

CITY OF LOS ANGELES, et al.

 

                        Defendants.

Case No.:

  24STCV15897

Hearing Date:

November 6, 2024

Hearing Time:

10:00 a.m.

[TENTATIVE] ORDER RE: 

 

MOTION TO BE RELIEVED AS COUNSEL

AND RELATED CROSS-ACTION

 

 

Samer Habbas and Samar Hellar of Law Offices of Samer Habbas & Associates, P.C. (“Counsel”) move to be relieved as counsel for Plaintiff Richard Bower (“Plaintiff”).  

The Court notes that while Counsel has provided sufficient reason for withdrawal, Item 5 of the proposed order is blank.

In addition, the Court notes that on October 14, 2024, Counsel filed a proof of service indicating that Counsel’s client was served with the moving papers on October 14, 2024 by electronic service. Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 3.1362, subdivision (d)(2), “[i]f the notice is served on the client by electronic service under Code of Civil Procedure section 1010.6 and rule 2.251, it must be accompanied by a declaration stating that the electronic service address is the client’s current electronic service address. As used in this rule, ‘current’ means that the address was confirmed within 30 days before the filing of the motion to be relieved. Merely demonstrating that the notice was sent to the client’s last known address and was not returned or no electronic delivery failure message was received is not, by itself, sufficient to demonstrate that the address is current. If the service is by mail, Code of Civil Procedure section 1011(b) applies.”

Item 3(c) of Counsel’s declaration (Form MC-052) provides that “Plaintiff confirmed his current email address on July 30, 2024, which was bower73.r@gmail.com. Plaintiff was served with the moving papers via email, at his current email addres, [sic] using RMail.” However, Counsel does not appear to demonstrate that Plaintiff’s electronic service address “was confirmed within 30 days before the filing of the motion to be relieved.” (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1362, subd. (d)(2).) The instant motion was filed on October 14, 2024.

Based on the foregoing, the Court denies the motion without prejudice. Counsel is ordered to give notice of this order.

 

DATED:  November 6, 2024

                        ________________________________

Hon. Teresa A. Beaudet

Judge, Los Angeles Superior Court